JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heckmann, S.M.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, H.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heckmann, S.M.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, H.-P.
J Dent Res 85(8):711-716, 2006
© 2006 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Clinical

Stress and Inflammation as a Detrimental Combination for Peri-implant Bone Loss

S.M. Heckmann1,*, J.J. Linke1, F. Graef2, Ch. Foitzik3, M.G. Wichmann1, and H.-P. Weber4

1 School of Dental Medicine, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Glückstr. 11, 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
2 Institute of Applied Mathematics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany;
3 Private Practice, Darmstadt, Germany; and
4 Department of Restorative Dentistry, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

* corresponding author, Siegfried.Heckmann{at}zp.med.uni-erlangen.de

The causes of peri-implant bone loss continue to be controversial. To determine the impact of biomechanical stress and inflammation, we investigated a total of 80 interforaminal implants in situ for more than 10 years. Two stress groups, with 14 patients each, were established: a low-stress situation with single-standing implants, and an increased-stress situation with splinted implants. To categorize inflammation, we introduced a Composite Inflammation Score using 4 inflammatory parameters. Peri-implant bone loss was calculated from digital panoramic radiographs. To differentiate between the effects of stress and inflammation, we compared bone loss in both stress groups at equivalent levels of inflammation. With greater Composite Inflammation Score values, a clear discrepancy between single-standing and splinted implants was evident (p = 0.117/0.000, regression analysis; p = 0.135/0.000, analysis of variance; p = 0.002, t tests). While stress and inflammation alone may not necessarily be detrimental factors, the presence of stress heightens peri-implant bone loss significantly as inflammation increases.

KEY WORDS: peri-implant bone loss • biomechanical stress • inflammation • single-standing implants • splinted implants







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2006 Institutional Access Guidelines