JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Q.
Right arrow Articles by van Palenstein Helderman, W.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Q.
Right arrow Articles by van Palenstein Helderman, W.H.
J Dent Res 85(5):469-472, 2006
© 2006 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Clinical

Caries-inhibiting Effect of Chlorhexidine Varnish in Pits and Fissures

Q. Zhang1,*, M.A. van ‘t Hof2, G.J. Truin2, E.M. Bronkhorst2, and W.H. van Palenstein Helderman3

1 Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Engineering (Wuhan University), Ministry of Education and Department of Endodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, P.R. China;
2 Department of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry and
3 WHO Collaborating Centre for Oral Health Care Planning and Future Scenarios, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, the Netherlands

* corresponding author, zhangqimary{at}yahoo.com.cn

Evidence regarding the caries-inhibiting effect of chlorhexidine varnish is inconclusive. This study investigated the caries-inhibiting effect of the varnish EC40 on pits and fissures of first permanent molars. A two-year randomized controlled trial was carried out among 461 six- to seven-year-old children. In a split-mouth design, one group of molars received EC40 at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months, and another group at baseline, 3, 12, and 15 months. Control molars did not receive EC40. Adherence to the treatment protocol was good. The dropout rate was 17%. Blinded examiners performed dental examinations.The caries-inhibiting effects of the two EC40 application schemes were comparable. The prevented fraction of caries was 25% (95%CI, 1%, 49%, p = 0.04) after 2 years and 9% (95%CI, –11%, 29%, p = 0.20) one year after termination of the trial, suggesting a short-term benefit from the use of EC40. The efficiency of EC40 is questionable in low-caries-incidence child populations.

KEY WORDS: caries prevention • chlorhexidine • varnish • randomized controlled trial







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2006 Institutional Access Guidelines