JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Appendix
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hujoel, P.P.
Right arrow Articles by Loesche, W.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hujoel, P.P.
Right arrow Articles by Loesche, W.J.
J Dent Res 85(4):298-305, 2006
© 2006 International and American Associations for Dental Research


REVIEW
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ORAL BIOLOGY & MEDICINE

Dental Flossing and Interproximal Caries: a Systematic Review

P.P. Hujoel1,2,*, J. Cunha-Cruz3, D.W. Banting4, and W.J. Loesche5

1 Department of Dental Public Health Sciences and
2 Department of Epidemiology, School of Dentistry, Box 357475. University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA;
3 Institute of Social Medicine, University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;
4 Division of Practice Administration, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada; and
5 School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

* corresponding author, hujoel{at}u.washington.edu

Our aim was to assess, systematically, the effect of flossing on interproximal caries risk. Six trials involving 808 subjects, ages 4 to 13 years, were identified. There were significant study-to-study differences and a moderate to large potential for bias. Professional flossing performed on school days for 1.7 years on predominantly primary teeth in children was associated with a 40% caries risk reduction (relative risk, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.48–0.76; p-value, < 0.001). Both three-monthly professional flossing for 3 years (relative risk, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.73–1.19; p-value, 0.32) and self-performed flossing in young adolescents for 2 years (relative risk, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.85–1.20; p-value, 0.93) did not reduce caries risk. No flossing trials in adults or under unsupervised conditions could be identified. Professional flossing in children with low fluoride exposures is highly effective in reducing interproximal caries risk. These findings should be extrapolated to more typical floss-users with care, since self-flossing has failed to show an effect.

KEY WORDS: dental caries • interproximal dental caries • dental floss • dental devices • home care • controlled trials • review • meta-analysis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
A.-M. Bollen, J. Cunha-Cruz, D. W. Bakko, G. J. Huang, and P. P. Hujoel
The Effects of Orthodontic Therapy on Periodontal Health: A Systematic Review of Controlled Evidence
J Am Dent Assoc, April 1, 2008; 139(4): 413 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2006 Institutional Access Guidelines