JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Appendix
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silva, N.R.F.A.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, V.P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silva, N.R.F.A.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, V.P.
J Dent Res 85(3):282-286, 2006
© 2006 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Biomaterials & Bioengineering

Evaluation of a Self-limiting Concept in Dentinal Caries Removal

N.R.F.A. Silva1, R.M. Carvalho2, L.F. Pegoraro2, F.R. Tay3, and V.P. Thompson1,*

1 Department of Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, New York University College of Dentistry, 345 East 24th Street, Room 804, New York, NY 10010, USA;
2 Department of Prosthodontics and Operative Dentistry, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Brazil; and
3 Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, 34 Hospital Road, Hong Kong SAR, China

* corresponding author, van.thompson{at}nyu.edu

The mechanical removal of dentinal caries traditionally involves the use of tactile sensation and/or caries-indicating dyes. This study tested the hypothesis that self-limiting polymer burs are as effective as conventional carbide burs in creating substrates for dentin bonding. Carious dentin from extracted human molars was removed with carbide or polymer burs, with dental explorer hardness as the end-point for caries removal. Dentin substrates were bonded with etch-and-rinse or self-etch adhesives and prepared for microtensile bond testing and transmission electron microscopy. For each bur type, there was no difference in bond strength between adhesives. However, the polymer bur surface exhibited significantly lower bond strengths than the carbide bur, and both were lower than flat, non-carious dentin controls. TEM revealed areas of incompletely removed, denatured caries-infected dentin in the polymer bur specimens. These first-generation polymer burs might best be utilized for deep caries removal where pulpal exposure is a concern.

KEY WORDS: polymer bur • caries-affected dentin • caries-infected dentin • microtensile bond strength • transparent zone







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2006 Institutional Access Guidelines