JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Potocnik, I.
Right arrow Articles by Bajrovic, F.F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Potocnik, I.
Right arrow Articles by Bajrovic, F.F.
J Dent Res 85(2):162-166, 2006
© 2006 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Biological

Articaine is More Effective than Lidocaine or Mepivacaine in Rat Sensory Nerve Conduction Block in vitro

I. Potocnik1,*, M. Tomsic2, J. Sketelj3, and F.F. Bajrovic3

1 Department of Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, University of Ljubljana, Dental School, Hrvatski trg 6,1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia;
2 Institut Jozef Stefan, Ljubljana; and
3 Institute of Pathophysiology, Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana

* corresponding author, igor.potocnik{at}mf.uni-lj.si

The reasons for the relatively high failure rate after inferior alveolar nerve block in dentistry are not fully understood. Therefore, the effectiveness of different anesthetic solutions (2% and 4% lidocaine, 3% mepivacine, 2% and 4% articaine) in depressing the compound action potential amplitude of the sensory fibers in the rat sural nerve was examined under strictly controlled conditions in vitro. After application of an anesthetic solution and stimulation of the nerve with a supramaximal electrical stimulus, a complete disappearance of the compound action potential of the C fibers, but not of the A fibers, was observed in all the experimental groups. Both 2% and 4% articaine more effectively depressed the compound action potential of the A fibers than did other anesthetic solutions. These results are discussed in the light of recent clinical reports finding no differences in the effectiveness between 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine regarding the inferior alveolar nerve block.

KEY WORDS: compound action potential • local anesthetic • nerve block • sensory nerve • rat




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
D. Robertson, J. Nusstein, A. Reader, M. Beck, and M. McCartney
The anesthetic efficacy of articaine in buccal infiltration of mandibular posterior teeth
J Am Dent Assoc, August 1, 2007; 138(8): 1104 - 1112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2006 Institutional Access Guidelines