JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Eijden, T.M.G.J.
Right arrow Articles by Mulder, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Eijden, T.M.G.J.
Right arrow Articles by Mulder, L.
J Dent Res 85(1):33-37, 2006
© 2006 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Biomaterials & Bioengineering

Structural and Mechanical Properties of Mandibular Condylar Bone

T.M.G.J. van Eijden*, P.N. van der Helm, L.J. van Ruijven, and L. Mulder

Department of Functional Anatomy, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Universiteit van Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands

* corresponding author, t.m.vaneijden{at}amc.uva.nl

The trabecular bone of the mandibular condyle is structurally anisotropic and heterogeneous. We hypothesized that its apparent elastic moduli are also anisotropic and heterogeneous, and depend on trabecular density and orientation. Eleven condyles were scanned with a micro-CT system. Volumes of interest were selected for the construction of finite element models. We simulated compressive and shear tests to determine the principal mechanical directions and the apparent elastic moduli. Compressive moduli were relatively large in directions acting in the sagittal plane, and small in the mediolateral direction. The degree of mechanical anisotropy ranged from 4.7 to 10.8. Shear moduli were largest in the sagittal plane and smallest in the transverse plane. The magnitudes of the moduli varied with the condylar region and were proportional to the bone volume fraction. Furthermore, principal mechanical direction correlated significantly with principal structural direction. It was concluded that variation in trabecular structure coincides with variation in apparent mechanical properties.

KEY WORDS: mandible • condyle • trabecular bone • finite element analysis • stiffness




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
S. Zhu, J. Hu, S. Zou, K. Kakudo, and M. Tsunokuma
Biomechanical Properties of the Condyle Created by Osteodistraction
J. Dent. Res., May 1, 2008; 87(5): 490 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2006 Institutional Access Guidelines