JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Appendix
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, S.O.
Right arrow Articles by Zlobin, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, S.O.
Right arrow Articles by Zlobin, N.
J Dent Res 84(8):715-720, 2005
© 2005 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Clinical

New Coronal Caries in Older Adults: Implications for Prevention

S.O. Griffin1,*, P.M. Griffin2, J.L. Swann2, and N. Zlobin2

1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Division of Oral Health/Surveillance, Investigations, and Research Branch, 4770 Buford Highway, MSF10, Chamblee, GA 30341, USA; and
2 School of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0205, USA;

* corresponding author, sig1{at}cdc.gov

To characterize the extent and severity of coronal caries among older US adults and document their need for prevention interventions, we systematically reviewed studies on coronal caries incidence, increment, and attack rate. We abstracted six studies and calculated summary measures using a random-effects model (95% confidence interval [95%CI]). We tested for heterogeneity and identified associated factors by examining the correlation between outcome measures and baseline population risk and study characteristics. We re-calculated summary measures after adjusting outcomes that netted out examiner reversals. Incidence and increment varied significantly by study. Adjusting studies for netting out examiner reversals reduced heterogeneity significantly. Annual attack rate among adjusted North American studies was 1.4 surfaces per 100 surfaces (95%CI = 1.0–1.9), or approximately 1 new carious surface per person per year. These rates are equal to or higher than those in children and indicate a need for caries-prevention services.

KEY WORDS: coronal caries • incidence • increment • attack rate • adults




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
S.O. Griffin, E. Regnier, P.M. Griffin, and V. Huntley
Effectiveness of Fluoride in Preventing Caries in Adults
J. Dent. Res., May 1, 2007; 86(5): 410 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2005 Institutional Access Guidelines