JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watson, P.S.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watson, P.S.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, C.
J Dent Res 84(5):451-455, 2005
© 2005 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Biological

Penetration of Fluoride into Natural Plaque Biofilms

P.S. Watson1,*, H.A. Pontefract2, D.A. Devine1, R.C. Shore1, B.R. Nattress2, J. Kirkham1, and C. Robinson1

1 Division of Oral Biology and 2 Department of Restorative Dentistry, Leeds Dental Institute, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS29LU, UK;

* corresponding author, denpsw{at}leeds.ac

Caries occurs at inaccessible stagnation sites where plaque removal is difficult. Here, the penetration through plaque of protective components, such as fluoride, is likely to be crucial in caries inhibition. We hypothesized that topically applied fluoride would readily penetrate such plaque deposits. In this study, plaque biofilms generated in vivo on natural enamel surfaces were exposed to NaF (1000 ppm F) for 30 or 120 sec (equivalent to toothbrushing) or for 30 min. Biofilms were then sectioned throughout their depth, and the fluoride content of each section was determined with the use of a fluoride electrode. Exposure to NaF for 30 or 120 sec increased plaque fluoride concentrations near the saliva interface, while concentrations near the enamel surface remained low. Fluoride penetration increased with duration of NaF exposure. Removal of exogenous fluoride resulted in fluoride loss and redistribution. Penetration of fluoride into plaque biofilms during brief topical exposure is restricted, which may limit anti-caries efficacy.

KEY WORDS: distribution • biomass • architecture • mass transfer • caries




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
P. Stoodley, J. Wefel, A. Gieseke, D. deBeer, and C. von Ohle
Biofilm Plaque and Hydrodynamic Effects on Mass Transfer, Fluoride Delivery and Caries
J Am Dent Assoc, September 1, 2008; 139(9): 1182 - 1190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
F. Garcia-Godoy and M. J. Hicks
Maintaining the integrity of the enamel surface: The role of dental biofilm, saliva and preventive agents in enamel demineralization and remineralization
J Am Dent Assoc, May 1, 2008; 139(suppl_2): 25S - 34S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
H.K. Yip, J. Guo, and W.H.S. Wong
Protection Offered by Root-surface Restorative Materials against Biofilm Challenge
J. Dent. Res., May 1, 2007; 86(5): 431 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Dent. Res.Home page
R.P. Allaker and D. Dymock
Proceedings of the 8th European Oral Microbiology Workshop
Adv. Dent. Res., November 1, 2005; 18(2): 27 - 33.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2005 Institutional Access Guidelines