|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH REPORTS |
1 Leuven BIOMAT Research Cluster, Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Catholic University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium;
2 Laboratory of Solid-State Physics and Magnetism, Department of Physics, Catholic University of Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200D, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium;
3 Department of Biomaterials, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine and Dentistry, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Okayama 700-8525, Japan; and
4 Division for General Dentistry, Hokkaido University Dental Hospital, Kita 13 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8586, Japan;
* corresponding author, bart.vanmeerbeek{at}med.kuleuven.ac.be
One-step adhesives bond less effectively to enamel/dentin than do their multi-step versions. To investigate whether this might be due to phase separation between adhesive ingredients, we characterized the interaction of 5 experimental and 3 commercial self-etch adhesives with dentin using transmission electron microscopy. All adhesives were examined for homogeneity by light microscopy. Bonding effectiveness to dentin was determined with the use of a micro-tensile bond-strength protocol. The lower bond strength of the one-step adhesives was associated with light-microscopic observation of multiple droplets that disappeared slowly. Interfacial analysis confirmed the entrapment of droplets within the adhesive layer. The prompt disappearance of droplets upon application of a small amount of HEMA (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) or a HEMA-containing bonding agent, as well as the absence of droplets at the interface of all HEMA-containing adhesives, strongly suggests that the adhesive monomers separate from water upon evaporation of ethanol/acetone. Upon polymerization, the droplets become entrapped within the adhesive, potentially jeopardizing bond durability. This can be avoided by strong air-drying of the adhesive, thereby removing interfacial water and thus improving bonding effectiveness.
KEY WORDS: adhesion monomer solvent phase separation
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Yuan, Y. Shimada, S. Ichinose, A. Sadr, and J. Tagami Effects of Dentin Characteristics on Interfacial Nanoleakage J. Dent. Res., October 1, 2007; 86(10): 1001 - 1006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.L. Van Landuyt, J. Snauwaert, J. De Munck, E. Coutinho, A. Poitevin, Y. Yoshida, K. Suzuki, P. Lambrechts, and B. Van Meerbeek Origin of Interfacial Droplets with One-step Adhesives J. Dent. Res., August 1, 2007; 86(8): 739 - 744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Breschi, A. Mazzoni, D.H. Pashley, G. Pasquantonio, A. Ruggeri, P. Suppa, G. Mazzotti, R. Di Lenarda, and F.R. Tay Electric-current-assisted Application of Self-etch Adhesives to Dentin. J. Dent. Res., December 1, 2006; 85(12): 1092 - 1096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.R. Tay, D.H. Pashley, N. Hiraishi, S. Imazato, F.A. Rueggeberg, U. Salz, J. Zimmermann, and N.M. King Tubular Occlusion Prevents Water-treeing and Through-and-Through Fluid Movement in a Single-bottle, One-step Self-etch Adhesive Model J. Dent. Res., October 1, 2005; 84(10): 891 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |