JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ekstrand, K.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ekstrand, K.R.
J Dent Res 83(Spec Iss C):C67-C71, 2004
© 2004 International and American Associations for Dental Research


PROCEEDINGS
Clinical

Improving Clinical Visual Detection—Potential for Caries Clinical Trials

K.R. Ekstrand

Department of Cariology and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; kim{at}odont.ku.dk

It has been the norm in caries clinical trials to measure caries increment by several different caries-recording systems, including the crude DMF-S/T index. However, there is a reserved attitude as to whether to subdivide the non-cavitated lesions and use arrested lesions in clinical trials. This has been due to the belief that it is not possible to achieve reliable data of the early stages of the disease (Radike, 1972). However, recently, Ekstrand et al.(1997, 1998) showed that it was possible: (1) to differentiate between different stages of non-cavitated occlusal lesions, (2) to differentiate between active and inactive occlusal lesions, and (3) to predict the depth of the lesion. In at least 4 other clinical studies, the reproducibility of recording initial active lesions, cavitated active lesions, and arrested lesions was found to be adequate (Carvalho et al., 1989; Nyvad et al, 1999; Ekstrand et al., 2000; Machiulskiene et al., 2001). Since caries today is a more slowly developing disease in many countries in the world, this will result in prolongation of the duration of the clinical trial, which will increase the costs. As indicated above, there is now sufficient evidence that caries can be clinically diagnosed accurately and reliably in earlier stages as well as in an arrested stage. If such stages of caries are used as outcome variables in caries clinical trials, they may have a positive influence on the trials’ duration and costs.

KEY WORDS: caries • detection • activity assessment • clinical trials




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
N.B. Pitts and J.W. Stamm
Preface
J. Dent. Res., July 1, 2004; 83(suppl_1): C4 - C5.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
N.B. Pitts
Modern Concepts of Caries Measurement
J. Dent. Res., July 1, 2004; 83(suppl_1): C43 - C47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2004 Institutional Access Guidelines