JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katz, B.P.
Right arrow Articles by Huntington, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katz, B.P.
Right arrow Articles by Huntington, E.
J Dent Res 83(Spec Iss C):C109-C112, 2004
© 2004 International and American Associations for Dental Research


PROCEEDINGS
Clinical

Statistical Issues for Combining Multiple Caries Diagnostics for Demonstrating Caries Efficacy

B.P. Katz1,*, and E. Huntington2

1 Division of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1050 Wishard Blvd, RG 4101, Indianapolis, IN 46260, USA; and
2 Unilever Research, Port Sunlight, Wirral, UK;

* corresponding author, bkatz{at}iupui.edu

Caries efficacy in clinical trials has been based primarily on visual examinations supplemented by Fiber Optic Transillumination (FOTI) and radiography, with the assessments combined at the surface level to classify each surface as to its caries status. Newer caries diagnostics techniques measure the caries process in a quantitative manner and so thus yield continuous rather than ordinal results. The objective of this study was to examine various methods for the analysis of multiple outcomes in clinical trials and to compare their usefulness for the analysis of caries trials. Four global tests (rank sum, ordinary least squares, general least squares, and generalized estimating equations) and two caries indices (based on average and maximum values of the methods) were evaluated with the use of one-year follow-up data from 1063 children in a recent caries trial. A new hybrid method was also developed and evaluated. All of the methods performed well when the diagnostic measures showed product differences in caries in the same direction. Ease of use, interpretability, and distributional assumptions must be considered before a consensus method for analysis of multiple diagnostic measures in caries trials can be determined.

KEY WORDS: statistical analysis • caries diagnostics • clinical trials




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
J.W. Stamm
The Classic Caries Clinical Trial: Constraints and Opportunities
J. Dent. Res., July 1, 2004; 83(suppl_1): C6 - C14.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
P.B. Imrey and A. Kingman
Analysis of Clinical Trials Involving Non-cavitated Caries Lesions
J. Dent. Res., July 1, 2004; 83(suppl_1): C103 - C108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2004 Institutional Access Guidelines