JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Imrey, P.B.
Right arrow Articles by Kingman, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Imrey, P.B.
Right arrow Articles by Kingman, A.
J Dent Res 83(Spec Iss C):C103-C108, 2004
© 2004 International and American Associations for Dental Research


PROCEEDINGS
Clinical

Analysis of Clinical Trials Involving Non-cavitated Caries Lesions

P.B. Imrey1,*, and A. Kingman2

1 Department of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation/Wb4, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; and
2 Biostatistics Core, Division of Population and Health Promotion Sciences, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 4As-25U, Bethesda, MD 20892-6401;

* corresponding author, pimrey{at}bio.ri.ccf.org

Treatments to halt or reverse the progression of non-cavitated caries lesions are of increasing interest. Diagnostic technologies under development offer potential for the assessment of gradual progression and regression of such lesions. Many therapies directed at correcting demineralization-remineralization imbalance should, in principle, protect enamel similarly across lesion severities from initiation to near cavitation. If this is so, and if acceptable reproducibility and predictive validity can be demonstrated for a diagnostic of acceptable cost, then clinical trials of agents to prevent cavitation can become more efficient by the use of outcome indices that reflect, in addition to cavitation, the expansion and regression of non-cavitated lesions. However, to achieve such a benefit will require data analyses that fully exploit ordinal or continuous-scale outcome measures. We consider comparison of such measures of lesion status between treatment groups, with most attention to ordinal categorical data. Interim data from a clinical trial in Lithuanian children are used for illustration.

KEY WORDS: dental caries • clinical trials • data analysis • ordinal categorical data • diagnostic modalities




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
N.B. Pitts and J.W. Stamm
Preface
J. Dent. Res., July 1, 2004; 83(suppl_1): C4 - C5.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
J.W. Stamm
The Classic Caries Clinical Trial: Constraints and Opportunities
J. Dent. Res., July 1, 2004; 83(suppl_1): C6 - C14.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2004 Institutional Access Guidelines