JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ayuse, T.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, A.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ayuse, T.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, A.R.
J Dent Res 83(9):718-722, 2004
© 2004 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Clinical

Mouth-opening Increases Upper-airway Collapsibility without Changing Resistance during Midazolam Sedation

T. Ayuse1,*, T. Inazawa1, S. Kurata1, I. Okayasu1, E. Sakamoto1, K. Oi1, H. Schneider2, and A.R. Schwartz2

1 Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Dept. of Clinical Physiology, 1-7-1 sakamoto Nagasaki-shi, 852-8588, Japan; and
2 The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Johns Hopkins Sleep Disorders Center, Baltimore, MD, USA;

* corresponding author, ayuse{at}net.nagasaki-u.ac.jp

Sedative doses of anesthetic agents affect upper-airway function. Oral-maxillofacial surgery is frequently performed on sedated patients whose mouths must be as open as possible if the procedures are to be accomplished successfully. We examined upper-airway pressure-flow relationships in closed mouths, mouths opened moderately, and mouths opened maximally to test the hypothesis that mouth-opening compromises upper-airway patency during midazolam sedation. From these relationships, upper-airway critical pressure (Pcrit) and upstream resistance (Rua) were derived. Maximal mouth-opening increased Pcrit to –3.6 ± 2.9 cm H2O compared with –8.7 ± 2.8 (p = 0.002) for closed mouths and –7.2 ± 4.1 (p = 0.038) for mouths opened moderately. In contrast, Rua was similar in all three conditions (18.4 ± 6.6 vs. 17.7 ± 7.6 vs. 21.5 ± 11.6 cm H2O/L/sec). Moreover, maximum mouth-opening produced an inspiratory airflow limitation at atmosphere that was eliminated when nasal pressure was adjusted to 4.3 ± 2.7 cm H2O. We conclude that maximal mouth-opening increases upper-airway collapsibility, which contributes to upper-airway obstruction at atmosphere during midazolam sedation.

KEY WORDS: critical pressure • conscious sedation • upper airway • mouth opening • mandibular position • sleep apnea




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. R. Schwartz, J. Kirkness, and P. Smith
Extraluminal tissue pressure: what does it mean?
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2006; 100(1): 5 - 6.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
K. Kairaitis, R. Stavrinou, R. Parikh, J. R. Wheatley, and T. C. Amis
Mandibular advancement decreases pressures in the tissues surrounding the upper airway in rabbits
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2006; 100(1): 349 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
T. Inazawa, T. Ayuse, S. Kurata, I. Okayasu, E. Sakamoto, K. Oi, H. Schneider, and A.R. Schwartz
Effect of Mandibular Position on Upper Airway Collapsibility and Resistance
J. Dent. Res., June 1, 2005; 84(6): 554 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2004 Institutional Access Guidelines