JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Appendix
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, S.O.
Right arrow Articles by Zlobin, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, S.O.
Right arrow Articles by Zlobin, N.
J Dent Res 83(8): 634-638, 2004
© 2004 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Clinical

Estimating Rates of New Root Caries in Older Adults

S.O. Griffin1,*, P.M. Griffin2, J.L. Swann2, and N. Zlobin2

1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Division of Oral Health/Surveillance, Investigations, and Research Branch, 4770 Buford Highway, MSF10, Chamblee, GA 30341, USA; and
2 School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0205, USA;

* corresponding author, sig1{at}cdc.gov

Although older adults are keeping their teeth longer, no national data are available on new caries in this age group. To characterize the extent of caries among older adults, we systematically reviewed studies on root caries incidence, increment, attack rate, and annual total (root + coronal) caries increment. We used a random-effects model to estimate annual summary measures and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) and tested for heterogeneity. For the 9 studies reporting root caries incidence, the summary measure equaled 23.7% (CI = 17.1–30.2%). For the 9 studies reporting root caries increment, the summary measure was 0.47 surfaces (CI = 0.34–0.61). For the 7 studies reporting total caries increment, the summary measure equaled 1.31 surfaces (95% CI = 1.01–1.61 surfaces). Because of heterogeneity, summary measures should be interpreted with caution. This research suggests, however, that older adults experience high rates of new caries and could benefit from caries-prevention programs.

KEY WORDS: root caries • incidence • increment




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
H.K. Yip, J. Guo, and W.H.S. Wong
Protection Offered by Root-surface Restorative Materials against Biofilm Challenge
J. Dent. Res., May 1, 2007; 86(5): 431 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
X.-L. Gao, J.-S. Pan, and C.-Y. Hsu
Laser-fluoride effect on root demineralization.
J. Dent. Res., October 1, 2006; 85(10): 919 - 923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
E.C.M. Lo, Y. Luo, H.P. Tan, J.E. Dyson, and E.F. Corbet
ART and Conventional Root Restorations in Elders after 12 Months.
J. Dent. Res., October 1, 2006; 85(10): 929 - 932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
S.O. Griffin, P.M. Griffin, J.L. Swann, and N. Zlobin
New Coronal Caries in Older Adults: Implications for Prevention
J. Dent. Res., August 1, 2005; 84(8): 715 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2004 Institutional Access Guidelines