JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (71)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buser, D.
Right arrow Articles by Steinemann, S.G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buser, D.
Right arrow Articles by Steinemann, S.G.
J Dent Res 83(7): 529-533, 2004
© 2004 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Biomaterials & Bioengineering

Enhanced Bone Apposition to a Chemically Modified SLA Titanium Surface

D. Buser1,*, N. Broggini1, M. Wieland2, R.K. Schenk1, A.J. Denzer2, D.L. Cochran3, B. Hoffmann1, A. Lussi4, and S.G. Steinemann2

1 Department of Oral Surgery and Stomatology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Freiburgstrasse 7, PO Box 64, 3010 Berne, Switzerland;
2 Institut Straumann AG, Waldenburg, Switzerland;
3 Department of Periodontics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA; and
4 Division of Pediatric Dentistry and Structural Biology, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland;

* corresponding author, daniel.buser{at}zmk.unibe.ch

Increased surface roughness of dental implants has demonstrated greater bone apposition; however, the effect of modifying surface chemistry remains unknown. In the present study, we evaluated bone apposition to a modified sandblasted/acid-etched (modSLA) titanium surface, as compared with a standard SLA surface, during early stages of bone regeneration. Experimental implants were placed in miniature pigs, creating 2 circular bone defects. Test and control implants had the same topography, but differed in surface chemistry. We created the test surface by submerging the implant in an isotonic NaCl solution following acid-etching to avoid contamination with molecules from the atmosphere. Test implants demonstrated a significantly greater mean percentage of bone-implant contact as compared with controls at 2 (49.30 vs. 29.42%; p = 0.017) and 4 wks (81.91 vs. 66.57%; p = 0.011) of healing. At 8 wks, similar results were observed. It is concluded that the modSLA surface promoted enhanced bone apposition during early stages of bone regeneration.

KEY WORDS: titanium surface • sandblasted and acid-etched surface • histomorphometric analysis • surface topography • surface chemistry




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
B. D. Boyan and Z. Schwartz
Response of Musculoskeletal Cells to Biomaterials
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., September 1, 2006; 14(10): S157 - S162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
C. M. STANFORD
Application of oral implants to the general dental practice
J Am Dent Assoc, August 1, 2005; 136(8): 1092 - 1100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. G. Keselowsky, D. M. Collard, and A. J. Garcia
Integrin binding specificity regulates biomaterial surface chemistry effects on cell differentiation
PNAS, April 26, 2005; 102(17): 5953 - 5957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2004 Institutional Access Guidelines