JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by El Zohairy, A.A.
Right arrow Articles by Feilzer, A.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by El Zohairy, A.A.
Right arrow Articles by Feilzer, A.J.
J Dent Res 83(5): 420-424, 2004
© 2004 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Biomaterials & Bioengineering

The Influence of Specimen Attachment and Dimension on Microtensile Strength

A.A. El Zohairy1, A.J. de Gee1,*, N. de Jager1, L.J. van Ruijven2, and A.J. Feilzer1

1 Department of Dental Materials Science and
2 Department of Functional Anatomy, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Louwesweg 1, 1066 EA Amsterdam, the Netherlands;

* corresponding author, a.degee{at}acta.nl

The higher microtensile bond strength values found for specimens with a smaller cross-sectional area are often explained by the lower occurrence of internal defects and surface flaws. We hypothesized that this aberrant behavior is mainly caused by the lateral way of attachment of the specimens to the testing device, which makes the strength dependent on the thickness. This study showed that composite bars of 1x1x10, 1x2x10, and 1x3x10mm attached at their 1-mm-wide side (situation A) fractured at loads of the same magnitude, as a result of which the microtensile strength (µTS), calculated as F/A (force at fracture/cross-sectional area), significantly increased for specimens with decreasing thickness. Attachment at the 1-, 2-, or 3-mm-wide side (situation B) resulted in equal µTS values (P > 0.05). Finite element analysis showed different stress patterns for situation A, but comparable patterns for situation B. Both situations showed the same maximum stress at fracture.

KEY WORDS: finite element analysis • microtensile bond strength • microtensile strength • composite




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
C.J. Soares, P.V. Soares, P.C.F. Santos-Filho, and S.R. Armstrong
Microtensile Specimen Attachment and Shape Finite Element Analysis
J. Dent. Res., January 1, 2008; 87(1): 89 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2004 Institutional Access Guidelines