JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakahara, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshimoto, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakahara, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshimoto, T.
J Dent Res 83(4): 307-311, 2004
© 2004 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Clinical

Somatosensory-evoked Fields for Gingiva, Lip, and Tongue

H. Nakahara1, N. Nakasato2,*, A. Kanno2, S. Murayama3, K. Hatanaka4, H. Itoh3, and T. Yoshimoto5

1 Dental Division, Miyagi National Hospital, Miyagi, Japan;
2 MEG Laboratory, Kohnan Hospital, 4-20-1 Nagamachi-Minami, Taihaku-ku, Sendai 982-8523, Japan;
3 Division of Stomatognathic Physiology and Prosthodontics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan;
4 Department of Applied Physics, Okayama University of Science, Okayama, Japan; and
5 Department of Neurosurgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan;

* corresponding author, nak{at}kohnan-sendai.or.jp

To localize the oral primary somatosensory cortex, we measured somatosensory-evoked fields for the lip, gingiva, and tongue in six healthy subjects. The latency of the first peak of the posterior-oriented current in the contralateral hemisphere was 50.9 ± 8.3 ms for the gingiva, significantly shorter than those for the lip and tongue peaks. The equivalent current dipole was localized on the central sulcus. The gingival dipole was localized significantly inferior to the lip dipole but not different from the tongue dipole. The moment of the gingival dipole was significantly smaller than that of the lip dipole but not different from that of the tongue dipole. Differences in the above parameters were negligible between the left and right, anterior and posterior, and upper and lower locations within the same organ, except that the dipole location for the anterior upper tongue was significantly inferior to that for the lower tongue.

KEY WORDS: magnetoencephalography • somatosensory evoked potential • gingiva • lip • tongue




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
K. Kubo, Y. Shibukawa, M. Shintani, T. Suzuki, T. Ichinohe, and Y. Kaneko
Cortical Representation Area of Human Dental Pulp
J. Dent. Res., April 1, 2008; 87(4): 358 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
H. Bessho, Y. Shibukawa, M. Shintani, Y. Yajima, T. Suzuki, and T. Shibahara
Localization of Palatal Area in Human Somatosensory Cortex
J. Dent. Res., March 1, 2007; 86(3): 265 - 270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. J. Miyamoto, M. Honda, D. N. Saito, T. Okada, T. Ono, K. Ohyama, and N. Sadato
The Representation of the Human Oral Area in the Somatosensory Cortex: a Functional MRI Study
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2006; 16(5): 669 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2004 Institutional Access Guidelines