|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH REPORT |
1 School of Dentistry,
2 School of Biomedical Sciences, and
3 Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia;
4 Edison Biotechnology Institute; and
5 Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA;
* corresponding author, j.smid{at}mailbox.uq.edu.au
Cementum is known to be growth-hormone (GH)-responsive, but to what extent is unclear. This study examines the effects of extremes of GH status on cementogenesis in three lines of genetically modified mice; GH excess (giant), GH antagonist excess (dwarf), and GH receptor-deleted (GHR-KO) (dwarf). Age-matched mandibular molar tissues were processed for light microscope histology. Digital images of sections of first molar teeth were captured for morphometric analysis of lingual root cementum. Cross-sectional area of the cellular cementum was a sensitive guide to GH status, being reduced nearly 10-fold in GHR-KO mice, three-fold in GH antagonist mice, and increased almost two-fold in giant mice (p < 0.001). Cellular cementum length was similarly influenced by GH status, but to a lesser extent. Acellular cementum was generally unaffected. This study reveals cellular cementum to be a highly responsive GH target tissue, which may have therapeutic applications in assisting regeneration of the periodontium.
KEY WORDS: cementum growth hormone GH transgenic mice GH receptor knockout mice
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.R. Smid, J.E. Rowland, W.G. Young, K.T. Coschigano, J.J. Kopchick, and M.J. Waters Mouse Molar Dentin Size/Shape is Dependent on Growth Hormone Status J. Dent. Res., May 1, 2007; 86(5): 463 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. O. Ramirez-Yanez, J. R. Smid, W. G. Young, and M. J. Waters Influence of growth hormone on the craniofacial complex of transgenic mice Eur J Orthod, October 1, 2005; 27(5): 494 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.D. Bosshardt Are Cementoblasts a Subpopulation of Osteoblasts or a Unique Phenotype? J. Dent. Res., May 1, 2005; 84(5): 390 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |