JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ko, C.C.
Right arrow Articles by Ritman, E.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ko, C.C.
Right arrow Articles by Ritman, E.L.
J Dent Res 82(8): 585-591, 2003
© 2003 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Biomaterials & Bioengineering

Effects of Implant Healing Time on Crestal Bone Loss of a Controlled-load Dental Implant

C.C. Ko1,*, W.H. Douglas1, R. DeLong1, M.D. Rohrer2, J.Q. Swift3, J.S. Hodges4, K.-N. An5, and E.L. Ritman6

1 MDRCBB, Department of Oral Science,
2 Division of Oral Pathology, Department of Oral Science,
3 Maxillofacial Surgery Division, University of Minnesota, and
4 Division of Biostatistics and School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455;
5 Orthopedics Biomechanics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, MN 55905; and
6 Department of Physiology & Biophysics, Mayo Medical School, Rochester, MN 55905;

* corresponding author, koxxx007{at}umn.edu

The universally accepted concept of delay-loaded dental implants has recently been challenged. This study hypothesizes that early loading (decreased implant healing time) leads to increased bone formation and decreased crestal bone loss. We used 17 minipigs to study implants under a controlled load, with non-loaded implants for comparison. Radiographic and histological assessments were made of the osseointegrated bone changes for 3 healing times (between implant insertion and loading), following 5 months of loading. The effect of loading on crestal bone loss depended on the healing time. Early loading preserved the most crestal bone. Delayed loading had significantly more crestal bone loss compared with the non-loaded controls (2.4 mm vs. 0.64 mm; P < 0.05). The histological assessment and biomechanical analyses of the healing bone suggested that loading and bioactivities of osteoblasts exert a synergistic effect on osseointegration that is likely to support the hypothesis that early loading produces more favorable osseointegration.

KEY WORDS: dental implant • early loading • crestal bone loss • biomechanics • micro-CT







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2003 Institutional Access Guidelines