JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuijs, R.H.
Right arrow Articles by Verdonschot, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuijs, R.H.
Right arrow Articles by Verdonschot, N.
J Dent Res 82(12): 967-971, 2003
© 2003 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Biomaterials & Bioengineering

Does Layering Minimize Shrinkage Stresses in Composite Restorations?

R.H. Kuijs1,*, W.M.M. Fennis2, C.M. Kreulen2, M. Barink3, and N. Verdonschot3

1 (PCT 117) Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry and Pedodontology, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
2 Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, The Netherlands; and
3 Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, The Netherlands;

*corresponding author, R.Kuijs{at}dent.umcn.nl

Polymerization shrinkage of resin composites may impair restoration longevity. It is hypothesized that layering, rather than bulk, techniques result in less stress in the tooth-restoration complex. The aim of this study was to compare shrinkage stresses for different restorative techniques used for cusp-replacing restorations with direct resin composite. In a 3-D FE model, the dynamic process of shrinkage during polymerization was simulated. Time-dependent parameters (shrinkage, apparent viscosity, Young’s modulus, Poisson ratio, and resulting creep), which change during the polymerization process, were implemented. Six different restorative procedures were simulated: a chemically cured bulk technique, a light-cured bulk technique, and 4 light-cured layering techniques. When polymerization shrinkage is considered, a chemically cured composite shows the least resulting stress. The differences seen among various layering build-up techniques were smaller than expected. The results indicate that the stress-bearing locations are the interface and the cervical part of the remaining cusp.

KEY WORDS: FE model • polymerization stress • composite • cusp replacement




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
C. S. Costa Pfeifer, R. R. Braga, and P. E. C. Cardoso
Influence of cavity dimensions, insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V restorations
J Am Dent Assoc, February 1, 2006; 137(2): 197 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2003 Institutional Access Guidelines