JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Ruijven, L.J.
Right arrow Articles by van Eijden, T.M.G.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Ruijven, L.J.
Right arrow Articles by van Eijden, T.M.G.J.
J Dent Res 82(10): 819-823, 2003
© 2003 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Biomaterials & Bioengineering

Prediction of Mechanical Properties of the Cancellous Bone of the Mandibular Condyle

L.J. van Ruijven*, E.B.W. Giesen1, M. Farella2, and T.M.G.J. van Eijden

Department of Functional Anatomy, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands;
1 Department of Orthodontics and Oral Biology, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands;
2 Department of Orthodontics, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy;

*corresponding author, l.j.vanruijven{at}amc.uva.n

The mechanical properties of cancellous bone depend on the bone structure. The present study examined the extent to which the apparent stiffness of the cancellous bone of the human mandibular condyle can be predicted from its structure. Two models were compared. The first, a structure model, used structural parameters such as bone volume fraction and anisotropy to estimate the apparent stiffness. The second was a finite element model (FEM) of the cancellous bone. The bone structure was characterized by micro-computed tomography. The calculated stiffnesses of 24 bone samples were compared with measured stiffnesses. Both models could predict 89% of the variation in the measured stiffnesses. From the stiffness approximated by FEM in combination with the measured stiffness, the stiffness of the bone tissue was estimated to be 11.1 ± 3.2 GPa. It was concluded that both models could predict the stiffness of cancellous bone with adequate accuracy.

KEY WORDS: cancellous bone • mandible • finite element model • apparent Young’s modulus




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
W. Geraets, L. van Ruijven, J. Verheij, T. van Eijden, and P. van der Stelt
A sensitive method for measuring spatial orientation in bone structures.
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2006; 35(5): 319 - 325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
T.M.G.J. van Eijden, P.N. van der Helm, L.J. van Ruijven, and L. Mulder
Structural and Mechanical Properties of Mandibular Condylar Bone
J. Dent. Res., January 1, 2006; 85(1): 33 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2003 Institutional Access Guidelines