JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Proeschel, P.A.
Right arrow Articles by Morneburg, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Proeschel, P.A.
Right arrow Articles by Morneburg, T.
J Dent Res 81(7): 464-468, 2002
© 2002 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Clinical

Task-dependence of Activity/ Bite-force Relations and its Impact on Estimation of Chewing Force from EMG

P.A. Proeschel*, and T. Morneburg

Department of Prosthodontics, University Dental Clinic, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Glueckstrasse 11, D 91054 Erlangen, Germany;

* corresponding author, peter.proeschel{at}rzmail.uni-erlangen.de

Estimation of chewing force from electromyograms (EMGs) calibrated in isometric biting yielded strikingly high force values. We tested the hypothesis that EMG-based force predictions are excessive because of differing activity/bite-force relations in mastication and isometric biting. In nine patients, unilateral bite forces and EMGs of 4 elevator muscles were recorded during chewing and isometric clenching on a bite-fork. We estimated chewing force by substituting chewing EMGs of each muscle into isometric activity/bite-force regressions. The estimates were compared with actual chewing forces recorded by intra-oral transducers. In all muscles except the balancing-side masseter, the activity/bite-force ratio was significantly higher in chewing than in isometric biting. The actual mean chewing force amounted to 220 N, while EMG-based estimates ranged from 273 to 475 N, depending on the muscle used for estimation. The results indicate that different activity/force characteristics in dynamic and isometric biting can cause overestimation when chewing force is predicted from masticatory EMGs.

KEY WORDS: activity • bite-force relation • mastication • clenching • estimated chewing force




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
P.A. Proeschel and J. Raum
Task-dependence of Jaw Elevator and Depressor Co-activation
J. Dent. Res., August 1, 2003; 82(8): 617 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2002 Institutional Access Guidelines