|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH REPORT |
Department of Prosthodontics, University Dental Clinic, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Glueckstrasse 11, D 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
* corresponding author, peter.proeschel{at}rzmail.uni-erlangen.de
Estimation of chewing force from electromyograms (EMGs) calibrated in isometric biting yielded strikingly high force values. We tested the hypothesis that EMG-based force predictions are excessive because of differing activity/bite-force relations in mastication and isometric biting. In nine patients, unilateral bite forces and EMGs of 4 elevator muscles were recorded during chewing and isometric clenching on a bite-fork. We estimated chewing force by substituting chewing EMGs of each muscle into isometric activity/bite-force regressions. The estimates were compared with actual chewing forces recorded by intra-oral transducers. In all muscles except the balancing-side masseter, the activity/bite-force ratio was significantly higher in chewing than in isometric biting. The actual mean chewing force amounted to 220 N, while EMG-based estimates ranged from 273 to 475 N, depending on the muscle used for estimation. The results indicate that different activity/force characteristics in dynamic and isometric biting can cause overestimation when chewing force is predicted from masticatory EMGs.
KEY WORDS: activity bite-force relation mastication clenching estimated chewing force
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P.A. Proeschel and J. Raum Task-dependence of Jaw Elevator and Depressor Co-activation J. Dent. Res., August 1, 2003; 82(8): 617 - 620. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |