|
|
||||||||
CONCISE REVIEW |
1 Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1200, Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5, Canada; and
2 School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, 1011 N. University, D2361, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1078;
* corresponding author, ismailai{at}umich.edu
Advances in life sciences that are predicted in the 21st century will present many challenges for health professionals and policy-makers. The major questions will be how to allocate resources to pay for costs of new technologies and who will best benefit from advances in new diagnostic and treatment methods. We review in this paper the concept of utility and how it can be applied and expanded to provide data to help health professionals make decisions that are preferred by patients and the public at large. Utility is a measure of people's well-being or preferences for outcomes. The measurement of utilities of a new diagnostic technology, for example, can be carried out with the use of simple methods that do not incorporate all of the uncertainties and potential outcomes associated with providing the test, or with more complex methods that can incorporate most uncertainties. This review describes and critiques the different measurement methods of utilities.
KEY WORDS: dental technology assessment preferences utilities outcomes health services research
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Heydecke, J.R. Penrod, Y. Takanashi, J.P. Lund, J.S. Feine, and J.M. Thomason Cost-effectiveness of Mandibular Two-implant Overdentures and Conventional Dentures in the Edentulous Elderly J. Dent. Res., September 1, 2005; 84(9): 794 - 799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |