JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Electronic Appendix
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeLong, R.
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, W.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DeLong, R.
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, W.H.
J Dent Res 81(5): 338-343, 2002
© 2002 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Biomaterials & Bioengineering

Helical Axis Errors Affect Computer-generated Occlusal Contacts

R. DeLong1,*, C.-C. Ko1, I. Olson1, J.S. Hodges2, and W.H. Douglas1

1 Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomaterials and Biomechanics, Department of Oral Science, University of Minnesota School of Dentistry, Moos Health Science Tower, 515 Delaware Street, SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455; and
2 Division of Biostatistics and Oral Health Clinical Research Center, Department of Preventive Sciences, University of Minnesota;

*corresponding author, delon002{at}tc.umn.edu

A helical axis describing mandibular motion can be calculated from two distinct positions of the mandible; however, as these positions come closer together, calculation errors increase. This study investigated the effects of errors in the calculated helical axis on simulated mandibular motion by the measurement of changes in occlusal contacts. A standard helical axis was calculated from a simulated lateral movement. A series of digital interocclusal records from centric to a 5° mandibular rotation about the standard helical axis was created. Digital dental cast models were aligned to the interocclusal records. Helical axis parameters and occlusal contacts calculated with the use of the aligned digital models were compared with those of the standard. Helical axes calculated from mandibular positions separated by 1.5° to 5.0° yielded equivalent occlusal contacts. Qualitatively, contacts for helical axes calculated from jaw rotations of 0.7° or larger were nearly identical to those of the standard.

KEY WORDS: helical axis • occlusal contacts • jaw motion • 3D scanning • interocclusal record




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
K. Hayashi, J. Uechi, S.-P. Lee, and I. Mizoguchi
Three-dimensional analysis of orthodontic tooth movement based on XYZ and finite helical axis systems
Eur J Orthod, December 1, 2007; 29(6): 589 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
S. B. PATEL, V. V. GORDAN, A. A. BARRETT, and C. SHEN
The effect of surface finishing and storage solutions on the color stability of resin-based composites
J Am Dent Assoc, May 1, 2004; 135(5): 587 - 594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
R. DeLong, M. Heinzen, J.S. Hodges, C.-C. Ko, and W.H. Douglas
Accuracy of a System for Creating 3D Computer Models of Dental Arches
J. Dent. Res., June 1, 2003; 82(6): 438 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2002 Institutional Access Guidelines