JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Childers, N.K.
Right arrow Articles by Michalek, S.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Childers, N.K.
Right arrow Articles by Michalek, S.M.
J Dent Res 81(1): 48-52, 2002
© 2002 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Clinical

Humans Immunized with Streptococcus mutans Antigens by Mucosal Routes

N.K. Childers*,1, G. Tong1, F. Li1, A.P. Dasanayake2, K. Kirk3, and S.M. Michalek4

1 Department of Pediatric Dentistry and
2 Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Room 308, 1530 3rd Ave. South, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA 35294-0007;
3 Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham; and
4 Department of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham;

*corresponding author, nkc{at}uab.edu

Strategies aimed at the prevention of Streptococcus mutans infection and dental caries include mucosal immunization, which results in salivary anti-S. mutans responses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of nasal vs. tonsillar immunization with S. mutans antigens in inducing salivary immune responses. Twenty-one adult subjects were immunized twice, within a seven-day interval, with a glucosyltransferase-enriched preparation (E-GTF) administered by nasal or tonsillar topical spray. Parotid saliva, nasal wash, and serum were collected prior to and at one- to two-week intervals for 3 months following immunization and were assayed by ELISA for anti-E-GTF activity. Results were analyzed by means of the mixed-models procedure with p < 0.05 level of significance. Significantly higher anti-E-GTF responses were detected in saliva and nasal wash samples from the group immunized by the nasal compared with the tonsillar route, indicating that nasal immunization was more effective in inducing mucosal responses in adults.

KEY WORDS: mucosal immunity • immunization • caries • liposomes • Streptococcus mutans




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
F.X. Lu and R.S. Jacobson
Oral Mucosal Immunity and HIV/SIV Infection
J. Dent. Res., March 1, 2007; 86(3): 216 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
A. Carapelli, M. Regoli, C. Nicoletti, L. Ermini, L. Fonzi, and E. Bertelli
Rabbit Tonsil-associated M-cells Express Cytokeratin 20 and Take Up Particulate Antigen
J. Histochem. Cytochem., October 1, 2004; 52(10): 1323 - 1332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2002 Institutional Access Guidelines