JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leloup, G.
Right arrow Articles by Vreven, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leloup, G.
Right arrow Articles by Vreven, J.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 80, 1605-1614, Copyright © 2001 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Meta-analytical review of factors involved in dentin adherence

G. Leloup, W. D'Hoore, D. Bouter, M. Degrange and J. Vreven
Department of Operative Dentistry, Universite catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. leloup@patd.ucl.ac.be

Literature data on adherence tests of dentin-bonding systems (DBS) may differ widely, even for the same DBS. The problem of bond testing is that materials are seldom compared with a standard, and experimental conditions often vary. We sought to identify the parameters that influence this variability. Using inclusion and exclusion criteria, we conducted a meta-analytical review of 75 articles, published between 1992 and 1996 in SCI reviews, that give bond strength data for 15 dentin-bonding agents of the so-called third and fourth generations. Seventeen selected parameters were classified into four groups: Group A includes factors related to the dentin substrate (i.e., nature of teeth); group B, composite and bonding area (i.e., composite stiffness); group C, storage conditions of the bonded samples (i.e., thermocycling); and group D, test design (i.e., crosshead speed). For each report, the experimental features, the bond strength means and standard deviations, and the failure mode were extracted and tabulated. Statistical Analysis System software was used to perform Pearson correlation analysis and analysis of variance, with bond strength as the dependent variable and experimental conditions as the independent variables. The meta-analytical review highlighted the significant influence of various parameters in the different groups: origin of dentin, types of teeth, pulpal pressure, tooth storage temperature, maximum storage time of teeth, and dentin depth in group A; type and stiffness of composite and bonding area in group B; storage of bonded samples (medium, temperature, and time) in group C, and testing mode and crosshead speed in group D. A significant positive correlation was observed between the mean bond strength and the rate of cohesive failure. It can be concluded from this study that some of these parameters should be controlled by the use of a standardized protocol. Unfortunately, the substrate-related variables are more difficult to control, even though their influence is consistent.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
S. Inoue, K. Koshiro, Y. Yoshida, J. De Munck, K. Nagakane, K. Suzuki, H. Sano, and B. Van Meerbeek
Hydrolytic Stability of Self-etch Adhesives Bonded to Dentin
J. Dent. Res., December 1, 2005; 84(12): 1160 - 1164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
J. De Munck, K. Van Landuyt, M. Peumans, A. Poitevin, P. Lambrechts, M. Braem, and B. Van Meerbeek
A Critical Review of the Durability of Adhesion to Tooth Tissue: Methods and Results
J. Dent. Res., February 1, 2005; 84(2): 118 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2001 Institutional Access Guidelines