JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hannigan, A.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hannigan, A.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, A. J.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 80, 427-431, Copyright © 2001 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

A re-analysis of a caries clinical trial by survival analysis

A. Hannigan, D. M. O'Mullane, D. Barry, F. Schafer and A. J. Roberts
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Limerick, Ireland. ailish.hannigan@ul.ie

The decline in caries prevalence, the increases in the level of fluoride exposure, and the lack of placebo control subjects have complicated caries clinical trials in recent times. There has been a substantial increase in the numbers of subjects required for the detection of statistically significant differences between dental products, and hence, the cost of these trials has grown enormously. This study uses a new statistical approach to the analysis of the data from these trials with the ultimate aim of providing a more sensitive method of analysis. The new approach uses survival analysis, where the outcome measure is the survival time of an individual tooth surface. It exploits recent developments in the analysis of clustered survival data where survival times within the same cluster or subject are correlated. To illustrate, the new method of analysis was used for the North Wales, UK, caries clinical trial. It is concluded that survival analysis uses most of the data available in a caries clinical trial, an outcome measure that is easily understood and may lead to a more sensitive method of analysis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
M.C.M. Wong, K.F. Lam, and E.C.M. Lo
Bayesian Analysis of Clustered Interval-censored Data
J. Dent. Res., September 1, 2005; 84(9): 817 - 821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
J.W. Stamm
The Classic Caries Clinical Trial: Constraints and Opportunities
J. Dent. Res., July 1, 2004; 83(suppl_1): C6 - C14.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
L.A. Mancl, P.P. Hujoel, and T.A. DeRouen
Efficiency Issues Among Statistical Methods for Demonstrating Efficacy of Caries Prevention
J. Dent. Res., July 1, 2004; 83(suppl_1): C95 - C98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
A. Hannigan
Using Survival Methodologies in Demonstrating Caries Efficacy
J. Dent. Res., July 1, 2004; 83(suppl_1): C99 - C102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
T. Harkanen, M.A. Larmas, J.I. Virtanen, and E. Arjas
Applying Modern Survival Analysis Methods to Longitudinal Dental Caries Studies
J. Dent. Res., February 1, 2002; 81(2): 144 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2001 Institutional Access Guidelines