JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, F.
Right arrow Articles by Herring, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, F.
Right arrow Articles by Herring, S. W.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 80, 327-335, Copyright © 2001 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Mass properties of the pig mandible

F. Zhang, G. E. Langenbach, A. G. Hannam and S. W. Herring
Department of Oral Health Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Specification of mass properties is an essential step in the modeling of jaw dynamics, but obtaining them can be difficult. Here, we used three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) to estimate jaw mass, mean bone density, anatomical locations of the mass and geometric centers, and moments of inertia in the pig jaw. High-resolution CT scans were performed at one-mm slice intervals on specimens submerged in water. The mean estimated jaw mass was 12% greater than the mean wet weight, and 33% more than the mean dry weight. Putative bone marrow accounted for an extra 13% of mass. There was a positive correlation between estimated mean bone density and age. The mass center was consistently in the midline, near the last molar. The mean distance between the mass center and geometric center was small, especially when bone marrow was taken into account (0.58 +/- 0.21 mm), suggesting that mass distribution in the pig jaw is almost symmetrical with respect to its geometric center. The largest moment of inertia occurred around each mandible's supero-inferior axis, and the smallest around its antero-posterior axis. Bone marrow contributed an extra 9% to the moments of inertia in all three axes. Linear relationships were found between the actual mass and a mass descriptor (product of the bounding volume and mean bone density), and between the moments of inertia and moments of inertia descriptors (products of the mass descriptor and two orthogonal dimensions forming the bounding box). The study suggests that imaging modalities revealing three-dimensional jaw shape may be adequate for estimating the bone mass properties in pigs.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2001 Institutional Access Guidelines