JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M. E.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 80, 309-313, Copyright © 2001 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals

ARTICLES

Analysis of ordinal dental data: evaluation of conflicting recommendations

M. E. Cohen
Naval Dental Research Institute, Great Lakes, IL 60088-5259, USA. mark.cohen@ndri.med.navy.mil

Although recommendations for the appropriate analysis of non-normal and ordinal-scaled data have appeared in the dental research literature for many years, there is no consensus. When one is conducting statistical tests for differences between groups, the central concern is whether it is safe to use parametric tests (e.g., analysis of variance), or if only non-parametric ranking tests should be considered. Relevant statistical and scientific issues associated with non-normality and measurement scale are reviewed, and three conclusions are reached regarding the analysis of dental data: (1) Parametric tests are sufficiently robust relative to typical violations of normality; (2) presumed statistical prohibitions against the application of parametric methods to ordinal data do not actually exist; and (3) 'ordinal' dental indices have sufficient quantitative meaning to be considered quasi-interval. For these reasons, parametric tests should not be avoided; they will be valid and usually more powerful and more easily applied to complex designs than non-parametric alternatives.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Clin RehabilHome page
F. Song, C. Jerosch-Herold, R. Holland, M. d. L. Drachler, K. Mares, and I. Harvey
Statistical methods for analysing Barthel scores in trials of poststroke interventions: a review and computer simulations
Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2006; 20(4): 347 - 356.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
J. Burns, A.-M. Keenan, and A. Redmond
Foot Type and Overuse Injury in Triathletes
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, May 1, 2005; 95(3): 235 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Dent. Res.Home page
P.B. Imrey and A. Kingman
Analysis of Clinical Trials Involving Non-cavitated Caries Lesions
J. Dent. Res., July 1, 2004; 83(suppl_1): C103 - C108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2001 Institutional Access Guidelines