JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, W. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, W. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. E.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 79, 840-849, Copyright © 2000 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Mass spectrometry of native rat amelogenins: primary transcripts, secretory isoforms, and C-terminal degradation

W. Y. Chen, A. W. Bell, J. P. Simmer and C. E. Smith
Division of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Cloning technologies have established unambiguously that amelogenins always seem larger in molecular weight (Mr) by gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) than by mass spectrometry (MS). This has caused many problems relating cloned versions of amelogenin to proteins actually secreted by ameloblasts in vivo. In this study, discrete protein fractions at 31-20 kDa (Mr(SDS)) were prepared from freeze-dried rat incisor enamel by techniques optimized for preserving protein integrity. N-terminal sequence and amino acid compositional analyses indicated that the major protein forming these fractions was amelogenin. As expected, the molecular weights estimated by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) and electrospray ionization (ESI) MS were significantly less than their apparent molecular weights estimated by SDS-PAGE. Plots of Mr(SDS) vs. Mr(MS) for all fractions showed high linear correlation (r = 0.992). Analysis of MS data further indicated that the major protein in the 27-kDa fraction corresponded to the R180 secretory isoform of rat amelogenin, whereas some minor proteins in the 23-kDa fraction likely corresponded to a R156 secretory isoform. This was in contrast to major proteins forming the 25-, 24-, and 23-kDa fractions (Mr(SDS)), which seemed to represent proteolytic fragments of R180 progressively altered at the P169-A170, P164-L165, and F151-S152 C-terminal cleavage sites, respectively. Proteins in the 20-kDa fraction (Mr(SDS)) most closely matched by ESI-MS fragments of the R156 secretory isoform that were C-terminally-modified at the equivalent P164-L165 site.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
O. Baba, N. Takahashi, T. Terashima, W. Li, P. K. DenBesten, and Y. Takano
Expression of Alternatively Spliced RNA Transcripts of Amelogenin Gene Exons 8 and 9 and Its End Products in the Rat Incisor
J. Histochem. Cytochem., September 1, 2002; 50(9): 1229 - 1236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
G. Orsini, P. Lavoie, C. E. Smith, and A. Nanci
Immunochemical Characterization of a Chicken Egg Yolk Antibody to Secretory Forms of Rat Incisor Amelogenin
J. Histochem. Cytochem., March 1, 2001; 49(3): 285 - 292.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2000 Institutional Access Guidelines