JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Santerre, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Tsang, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Santerre, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Tsang, H.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 78, 1459-1468, Copyright © 1999 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Biodegradation of commercial dental composites by cholesterol esterase

J. P. Santerre, L. Shajii and H. Tsang
Department of Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

The research literature suggests that current dental polymeric composites are not chemically inert at the material/biological interface. Several studies have investigated the process of "biodegradation" on dental composites in the presence of enzymes, by monitoring changes in weight loss and surface hardness properties. However, it is hypothesized that these methods can provide an erroneous measure of biochemically induced degradation, since they are less sensitive to molecular events and lack the ability to provide chemical information. Knowledge of the latter is important because it relates to the biological significance of biodegradation, i.e., the identification and quantification of released compounds that may be capable of influencing cell, bacteria, or enzyme function. It was the objective of this study to compare three methods (weight loss, surface micro-hardness, and liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry) for their ability to measure the effect of enzyme-induced biodegradation on three commercial composite resin materials. The enzyme was cholesterol esterase, and the composites were Silux Plus XL, Z100 A2 (3M), and TPH XL (L.D. Caulk). Biodegradation was readily detected by liquid chromatography, and its sensitivity was shown to be substantially greater than that of weight loss or surface hardness measurements, although surface hardness measurements did show some agreement with liquid chromatography data. The data also indicated that the levels and distribution of released degradation products can vary substantially from one product to the next, and that this merits further investigation if the potential impact of different commercial restorative materials on cell and bacteria function is to be assessed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
S. C. Bayne
Dental Biomaterials: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?
J Dent Educ., May 1, 2005; 69(5): 571 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
Y. Finer and J.P. Santerre
Salivary Esterase Activity and Its Association with the Biodegradation of Dental Composites
J. Dent. Res., January 1, 2004; 83(1): 22 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1999 Institutional Access Guidelines