Journal of Dental Research, Vol 78, 628-637, Copyright © 1999 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals

ARTICLES

Glass-ionomer restoratives: a systematic review of a secondary caries treatment effect

R. C. Randall and N. H. Wilson
Restorative Dentistry, Manchester University Turner Dental School, United Kingdom.

It is generally accepted that glass ionomers inhibit secondary caries in vivo, and data from in vitro studies support this effect. The aim of this review was a systematic assessment, from the literature, of clinical evidence for the ability of glass-ionomer restoratives to inhibit secondary caries at the restoration margin. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for selection of the review papers were established prior to commencement of the literature search. Papers which conformed to these criteria, and reported on secondary caries as an outcome, were selected (N = 52). Primary and secondary lists of systematic criteria for use in the assessment of the papers were drawn up. The primary list of 14 criteria was applied to each paper. No paper fulfilled all these criteria, necessitating the use of the secondary measures: (i) a prospective study and (ii) use of an appropriate control. This yielded 28 papers. Tabulation of these papers by occurrence of secondary caries in the glass-ionomer or control groups demonstrated an even distribution between positive and negative outcomes. Valid evidence is considered to be best obtained from randomized, controlled studies of sufficient sample size. No conclusive evidence for or against a treatment effect of inhibition of secondary caries by the glass-ionomer restoratives was obtained from the systematic review. There is a need for appraisal of the methods currently adopted for the clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer restorative materials, and for further development of the methodology to support future systematic reviews.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. K. Ersin, U. Candan, A. Aykut, O. Oncag, C. Eronat, and T. Kose A clinical evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach: Results at 24 months. J Am Dent Assoc, November 1, 2006; 137(11): 1529 - 1536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. BADER and A. ISMAIL Survey of systematic reviews in dentistry J Am Dent Assoc, April 1, 2004; 135(4): 464 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.M. Carey, M. Spencer, R.J. Gove, and F.C. Eichmiller Fluoride Release from a Resin-modified Glass-ionomer Cement in a Continuous-flow System: Effect of pH J. Dent. Res., October 1, 2003; 82(10): 829 - 832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. W. HAVEMAN, J. B. SUMMITT, J. O. BURGESS, and K. CARLSON Three restorative materials and topical fluoride gel used in xerostomic patients: A clinical comparison J Am Dent Assoc, February 1, 2003; 134(2): 177 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]