JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tan, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fincham, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tan, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fincham, A. G.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 77, 1388-1396, Copyright © 1998 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Quantitative analysis of amelogenin solubility

J. Tan, W. Leung, J. Moradian-Oldak, M. Zeichner-David and A. G. Fincham
Center for Craniofacial Molecular Biology, University of Southern California, School of Dentistry, Los Angeles 90033, USA.

Amelogenins are a group of extracellular enamel matrix proteins which are believed to be involved in the regulation of the size and habits of forming enamel crystals. The aim of this study was to compare the solubility properties of several amelogenins at various pH (from 4.0 to 9.0) at constant ionic strength (IS), and to examine the influence of buffer composition, IS, and divalent metal ions (including Ca2+, Mg2+, and Zn2+) on amelogenin solubility. The solubility of the recombinant murine amelogenin ("rM179") was minimum near its isoelectric point and increased rapidly below and above, regardless of buffer composition. A similar trend was observed for the native porcine ("25K") amelogenin. Porcine "23K" amelogenin was only sparingly soluble from pH of 4.0 to 9.0, in contrast to the analogous recombinant "rM166", which was more soluble in acidic solutions. The synthetic amelogenin polypeptide "TRAP" was extremely insoluble, while synthetic LRAP was readily soluble. Porcine "20K" amelogenin solubility increased strikingly as the solution pH was lowered from 7.0 to 6.0. Increasing IS decreased the solubility of rM179. While Zn2+ reduced rM179 solubility, Ca2+ and Mg2+ showed no significant effects. We conclude that the solubility of amelogenin was dependent on the primary structure, solution pH, and IS, and the low solubility of amelogenins under physiological conditions may result from their tendency to form quaternary (aggregate) structures in vivo.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
H.C. Margolis, E. Beniash, and C.E. Fowler
Role of Macromolecular Assembly of Enamel Matrix Proteins in Enamel Formation
J. Dent. Res., September 1, 2006; 85(9): 775 - 793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
S. Habelitz, A. Kullar, S.J. Marshall, P.K. DenBesten, M. Balooch, G.W. Marshall, and W. Li
Amelogenin-guided Crystal Growth on Fluoroapatite Glass-ceramics
J. Dent. Res., September 1, 2004; 83(9): 698 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. J. Caterina, Z. Skobe, J. Shi, Y. Ding, J. P. Simmer, H. Birkedal-Hansen, and J. D. Bartlett
Enamelysin (Matrix Metalloproteinase 20)-deficient Mice Display an Amelogenesis Imperfecta Phenotype
J. Biol. Chem., December 13, 2002; 277(51): 49598 - 49604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. M. H. Ravindranath, J. Moradian-Oldak, and A. G. Fincham
Tyrosyl Motif in Amelogenins Binds N-Acetyl-D-glucosamine
J. Biol. Chem., January 22, 1999; 274(4): 2464 - 2471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. M. H. Ravindranath, W.-Y. Tam, P. Nguyen, and A. G. Fincham
The Enamel Protein Amelogenin Binds to the N-Acetyl-D-glucosamine-mimicking Peptide Motif of Cytokeratins
J. Biol. Chem., December 8, 2000; 275(50): 39654 - 39661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1998 Institutional Access Guidelines