JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lawrence, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Offenbacher, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lawrence, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Offenbacher, S.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 77, 1904-1912, Copyright © 1998 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals

ARTICLES

Pharmacokinetic and safety evaluations of ketoprofen gels in subjects with adult periodontitis

H. P. Lawrence, D. W. Paquette, P. C. Smith, G. Maynor, R. Wilder, G. L. Mann, T. Binder, E. Troullos, M. Annett, M. Friedman and S. Offenbacher
Department of Dental Ecology, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 27599-7450, USA.

This clinical trial used a randomized, partially double-blind, controlled parallel design to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of the NSAID, ketoprofen (KTP), in gel formulations. Forty-two subjects, ages 35 to 57 years, with generalized, moderate to advanced adult periodontitis were recruited and randomized to one of 5 treatments over a 14 1/2-day treatment period: (1) 0.5% KTP gel; (2) 1.0% KTP gel; (3) 1.0% KTP alternate gel; (4) 2.0% KTP gel; and (5) 25 mg KTP capsule (positive control). Plasma samples were obtained on days 1 (pre-dosing, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6 hr), 8 (pre-dosing, 2 hr), 15 (pre-dosing, 2 hr), and 22 (7 days post-treatment). Plasma KTP concentrations were determined by means of high-performance liquid chromatography. Significant differences in mean area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) among the groups were detected (p < 0.001), with the 25 mg p.o. capsule exhibiting the largest value (5054 ng-hr/mL), the 2.0% gel exhibiting an intermediate value (2244 ng-hr/mL), the 1.0% gels exhibiting lower but comparable values (1516 for the alternate formulation vs. 1461 ng-hr/mL), and the 0.5% gel showing the lowest value (736 ng-hr/mL). Significant differences in dose- and weight-adjusted maximum plasma concentration (Cmax/dose/kg) were detected overall such that the 25 mg p.o. capsule demonstrated higher values as compared with the 4 gel formulations (p = 0.001). The 5 treatments exhibited similar mean times of maximum plasma concentration (tmax) values ranging from 0.6 to 1 hr. Systemic exposures relative to dose and body weight were lower for the gel formulations than for the capsule. The relative systemic bioavailability of the gels compared with peroral administration ranged from 54% to 69%.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1998 Institutional Access Guidelines