JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adachi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Matsuya, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adachi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Matsuya, T.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 76, 1745-1750, Copyright © 1997 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals

ARTICLES

Measurement of velopharyngeal movements induced by isolated stimulation of levator veli palatini and pharyngeal constrictor muscles

T. Adachi, M. Kogo, S. Iida, M. Hamaguchi and T. Matsuya
First Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Osaka University, Faculty of Dentistry, Japan.

The levator veli palatini (LVP) and superior pharyngeal constrictor muscles (PC) close the velopharynx. However, for the velopharyngeal movements to be understood in detail, each muscle contraction must be analyzed precisely. This study was performed to clarify the velopharyngeal movement which was induced by a single muscle contraction, LVP or PC. Using a nasopharyngeal fiberscope, we analyzed the velopharyngeal movement associated with the contraction of the LVP and PC muscles in mongrel dogs. To elicit the maximal contraction of each muscle, we applied repetitive electrical stimulation to each peripheral nerve efferent to the LVP or PC muscle. Stimulation with a frequency of 77 Hz and 83 Hz induced maximal tension in the LVP and PC muscles, respectively, in isometric contraction. In a second series of experiments, fiberscopic views of the velopharyngeal movements associated with each muscle's maximal contraction were recorded. The degree of closure was calculated at several sections. The LVP muscle pulled the caudal fourth of the soft palate, while the PC projected the posterior wall at the level of the caudal end of the soft palate. The PC muscle also projected the lateral wall of the velopharynx. The effect of LVP contraction on the lateral wall was very small. These results show that the velopharyngeal movement associated with LVP contraction is very different from that with PC contraction.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1997 Institutional Access Guidelines