|
|
||||||||
Journal of Dental Research, Vol 75, 1518-1523, Copyright © 1996 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals
ARTICLES |
P. Raval, H. H. Hsu, D. J. Schneider, M. P. Sarras Jr, K. Masuhara, L. F. Bonewald and H. C. Anderson
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City 66160, USA.
Freeze-dried Saos-2, human osteosarcoma cells, and extracts of Saos-2 cells contain all components necessary to induce ectopic new bone and marrow when implanted into athymic Nu/Nu nuce. On the other hand, human osteosarcoma cells of the U-2 OS strain failed to induce bone formation under the same experimental conditions. Our aim was to compare the relative expressions of known osteoinductive factors including bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) in these two cell lines in an attempt to explain the unique bone-inducing ability of the Saos-2 cells. Saos-2 cells expressed mRNA for BMP-1, -2, -3, -4,-6, and TGF-beta 1. The non-osteoinductive U-2 OS cells expressed BMP-2, -4, -5, -6, and -7 as well as TGF-beta 1 mRNA, while levels of BMP-1 and BMP-3 mRNA were either not detectable or detectable at a very low level in U-2 OS cells. The presence of BMP-1 and -4 protein was confirmed in Saos-2 cells by immunofluorescence, and TGF beta protein was demonstrated by bioassay in both cell types. These findings suggest that Saos-2 cells are endowed qualitatively and quantitatively with sufficient amounts of many bone morphogenetic proteins-especially BMP-1, -3, and -4-to confer osteoinductivity upon these cells. However, the absence of osteoinductivity in U-2 OS cells, despite significant mRNA expression levels of several bone morphogenetic proteins, suggests that, even though expression of one or more bone morphogenetic proteins may be present, it may not necessarily be sufficient to confer osteoinductivity upon U-2 OS cells. U-2 OS cells may be non-osteoinductive because (1) they contain inhibitors to the BMPs or secrete inhibitory binding proteins, (2) they do not process BMPs correctly, or (3) the BMPs are inappropriately localized and sequestered within the U-2 OS cells. Saos 2 cells may be osteoinductive because (1) they uniquely express BMP-1, (2) they express an appropriate combination of interactive BMPs at appropriate levels, and/or (3) the Saos-2 cells elaborate as-yet-unidentified osteoinductive factor(s).
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. K. Jeffery, P. D. Upton, R. C. Trembath, and N. W. Morrell BMP4 inhibits proliferation and promotes myocyte differentiation of lung fibroblasts via Smad1 and JNK pathways Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, February 1, 2005; 288(2): L370 - L378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. E. Kochanowska, K. Wlodarski, A. Wojtowicz, A. Kinsner, and K. Ostrowski BMP-4 and BMP-6 Involvement in the Osteogenic Properties of the HeLa Cell Line Experimental Biology and Medicine, January 1, 2002; 227(1): 57 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. van den Wijngaard, W. R. Mulder, R. Dijkema, C. J .C. Boersma, S. Mosselman, E. J. J. van Zoelen, and W. Olijve Antiestrogens Specifically Up-Regulate Bone Morphogenetic Protein-4 Promoter Activity in Human Osteoblastic Cells Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2000; 14(5): 623 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |