JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Winkler, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Paydar, N. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Winkler, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Paydar, N. H.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 75, 1477-1483, Copyright © 1996 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Finite element stress analysis of three filling techniques for class V light-cured composite restorations

M. M. Winkler, T. R. Katona and N. H. Paydar
Dental Materials Division, Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis, School of Dentistry 46202, USA.

An important disadvantage of current dental resin composites is polymerization shrinkage. This shrinkage has clinical repercussions such as sensitivity, marginal discoloration, and secondary caries. The objective of this study was to compare three filling techniques in terms of the transient stresses induced at the resin composite/tooth interface during polymerization. The techniques were: bulk filling (B), three horizontal increments (HI), and three wedge increments (WI). A simple Class V cavity preparation was modeled in finite element analysis. Polymerization shrinkage was simulated by a thermal stress analogy, thereby causing 1% shrinkage due to an arbitrary coefficient of thermal expansion. Interface normal and shear stresses were calculated at nine steps during polymerization, proceeding from 0% to 100% volume of cured resin. The importance of the interface transient stresses was revealed by the finding that, in most cases, their peak values exceeded the final or residual stress. Also, the WI and B techniques consistently exhibited the highest and lowest maximum transient stresses, respectively. These results from the simple model of a Class V restoration suggest that bulk filling of light-cured resin composites should be used in restorations which are sufficiently shallow to be cured to their full depth.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
C. S. Costa Pfeifer, R. R. Braga, and P. E. C. Cardoso
Influence of cavity dimensions, insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V restorations
J Am Dent Assoc, February 1, 2006; 137(2): 197 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
R.H. Kuijs, W.M.M. Fennis, C.M. Kreulen, M. Barink, and N. Verdonschot
Does Layering Minimize Shrinkage Stresses in Composite Restorations?
J. Dent. Res., December 1, 2003; 82(12): 967 - 971.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
D. FORTIN and M. A. VARGAS
THE SPECTRUM OF COMPOSITES:NEW TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS
J Am Dent Assoc, June 1, 2000; 131(suppl_1): 26S - 30S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1996 Institutional Access Guidelines