Journal of Dental Research, Vol 75, 871-878, Copyright © 1996 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals

ARTICLES

Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses?

A. Versluis, W. H. Douglas, M. Cross and R. L. Sakaguchi
Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomaterials and Biomechanics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA.

It is widely accepted that volumetric contraction and solidification during the polymerization process of restorative composites in combination with bonding to the hard tissue result in stress transfer and inward deformation of the cavity walls of the restored tooth. Deformation of the walls decreases the size of the cavity during the filling process. This fact has a profound influence on the assumption--raised and discussed in this paper--that an incremental filling technique reduces the stress effect of composite shrinkage on the tooth. Developing stress fields for different incremental filling techniques are simulated in a numerical analysis. The analysis shows that, in a restoration with a well-established bond to the tooth--as is generally desired--incremental filling techniques increase the deformation of the restored tooth. The increase is caused by the incremental deformation of the preparation, which effectively decreases the total amount of composite needed to fill the cavity. This leads to a higher-stressed tooth-composite structure. The study also shows that the assessment of intercuspal distance measurements as well as simplifications based on generalization of the shrinkage stress state cannot be sufficient to characterize the effect of polymerization shrinkage in a tooth-restoration complex. Incremental filling methods may need to be retained for reasons such as densification, adaptation, thoroughness of cure, and bond formation. However, it is very difficult to prove that incrementalization needs to be retained because of the abatement of shrinkage effects.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. S. Costa Pfeifer, R. R. Braga, and P. E. C. Cardoso Influence of cavity dimensions, insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V restorations J Am Dent Assoc, February 1, 2006; 137(2): 197 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R.H. Kuijs, W.M.M. Fennis, C.M. Kreulen, M. Barink, and N. Verdonschot Does Layering Minimize Shrinkage Stresses in Composite Restorations? J. Dent. Res., December 1, 2003; 82(12): 967 - 971. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. DELIPERI and D. N. BARDWELL An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2002; 133(10): 1387 - 1398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. CONDON and J. L. FERRACANE ASSESSING THE EFFECT OF COMPOSITE FORMULATION ON POLYMERIZATION STRESS J Am Dent Assoc, April 1, 2000; 131(4): 497 - 503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. D. JACKSON and M. MORGAN THE NEW POSTERIOR RESINS AND: A SIMPLIFIED PLACEMENT TECHNIQUE J Am Dent Assoc, March 1, 2000; 131(3): 375 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]