JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lamkin, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Oppenheim, F. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lamkin, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Oppenheim, F. G.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 75, 803-808, Copyright © 1996 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Temporal and compositional characteristics of salivary protein adsorption to hydroxyapatite

M. S. Lamkin, A. A. Arancillo and F. G. Oppenheim
Department of Periodontology and Oral Biology, Boston University Medical Center, Massachusetts 02118, USA.

Salivary proteins bind to enamel surfaces and hydroxyapatite in a highly selective manner. Numerous studies have identified these proteins as primarily proline-rich proteins, cystatins, statherin, and histatins. Previously, the hydroxyapatite-binding potential of these proteins had been characterized in systems consisting of singly purified protein and adsorbent. The purpose of this study was to investigate the adsorption of each protein in the presence of complete salivary secretion. Proteins, shown to adsorb to hydroxyapatite, were purified, biotinylated, and added back to the remaining proteins to form a series of reconstituted secretions. The adsorption of each biotinylated protein in the reconstituted secretion to hydroxyapatite was then measured as a function of time. Results indicated that three different adsorption patterns occur. A simple hyperbolic pattern is characteristic of amylase, glycosylated proline-rich protein (PRG), and cystatin. A faster adsorption process is observed for PRP-3, PRP-4, PIF-f, and statherin. A more complex pattern, exhibiting a rapid phase followed by a slower phase, is characteristic of PRP-1, PRP-2, PIF-s, and histatins. These results suggest that there are different adsorption processes involved in the binding of salivary proteins to hydroxyapatite. Two possible mechanisms are direct adsorption of protein to hydroxyapatite and indirect adsorption of protein by interacting with other proteins already bound to hydroxyapatite.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
G.B. Proctor, R. Pramanik, G.H. Carpenter, and G.D. Rees
Salivary Proteins Interact with Dietary Constituents to Modulate Tooth Staining
J. Dent. Res., January 1, 2005; 84(1): 73 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med.Home page
Y. Jin and H.-K. Yip
SUPRAGINGIVAL CALCULUS: FORMATION AND CONTROL
Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med., September 1, 2002; 13(5): 426 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Gong, L. Mailloux, and M. C. Herzberg
Salivary Film Expresses a Complex, Macromolecular Binding Site for Streptococcus sanguis
J. Biol. Chem., March 17, 2000; 275(12): 8970 - 8974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1996 Institutional Access Guidelines