JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teng, S.
Right arrow Articles by Herring, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Teng, S.
Right arrow Articles by Herring, S. W.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 75, 1842-1850, Copyright © 1996 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals

ARTICLES

Anatomic and directional variation in the mechanical properties of the mandibular condyle in pigs

S. Teng and S. W. Herring
University of Washington, Department of Orthodontics, Seattle 98195-7446, USA.

Stereologic studies of trabecular architecture suggest that the pig mandibular condyle is strongest when loaded supero-inferiorly, and that stress is concentrated in the antero-inferior region (Teng and Herring, 1995). To test these hypotheses, we investigated the uni-axial mechanical properties of 22 pig mandibular condyles in three loading directions at a mean strain rate of 0.14 (+/- 0.12)% s-1. A total of 91 rectangular beam specimens (averaging 9.0 mm x 6.0 mm x 5.0 mm) was tested. For each specimen, 5 or 6 non-destructive tests were performed before compressive failure. Strain in both longitudinal and transverse directions was measured by foil strain gauges on the central part of the specimen. Data were normalized at a strain rate of 0.1% s-1, specimen length of 9 mm, and cross-sectional area of 30.25 mm2. Generally, modulus of elasticity (E) and ultimate stress (sigma u) in the anterior regions of the condyle were greater than those in the posterior. E, sigma u, and Poisson's ratio (upsilon) were significantly different among the test directions, but ultimate strain (epsilon u) was not. The highest values of E (4.04 GPa), sigma u (14.97 MPa), and rho (0.81 g/cm3) were seen in the anterior inferior/middle region under supero-inferior loading. The lowest values (0.94 GPa for E, 2.38 MPa for sigma u, and 0.52 g/cm3 for rho) were found in the inferior/posterior region in medio-lateral loading. Although the mechanical properties of the condyle vary depending upon location, these results verify that the condyle is strongest and stiffest under compressive loads in the supero-inferior direction, and that the anterior-inferior region is particularly strong and stiff.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Dent. Res.Home page
S. Zhu, J. Hu, S. Zou, K. Kakudo, and M. Tsunokuma
Biomechanical Properties of the Condyle Created by Osteodistraction
J. Dent. Res., May 1, 2008; 87(5): 490 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1996 Institutional Access Guidelines