JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zwijnenburg, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Naeije, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zwijnenburg, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Naeije, M.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 75, 1798-1803, Copyright © 1996 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Jaw movement responses to electrical stimulation of different parts of the human temporalis muscle

A. J. Zwijnenburg, G. W. Kroon, B. Verbeeten Jr and M. Naeije
Department of Oral Kinesiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Previous EMG studies have provided indications for the differential activation of the human temporalis muscle. However, in these studies the contribution of different parts of the temporalis muscle could not be separated from the contributions of other muscles, since contraction was performed by voluntary activation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine functional differences among various parts of the human temporalis muscle by means of recording the incisal point movement response to electrical stimulation of parts of the muscle. Five healthy male subjects participated in this study. Three locations (anterior, middle, and posterior temporalis muscle) were stimulated, by means of monopolar wire electrodes and rectangular pulses. The insertion depths of the stimulation electrodes were determined by means of magnetic resonance images. Stimulation was performed in four jaw positions (resting position, 50% maximum mouth opening, 1 cm to the left, and 1 cm to the right). Movement responses to stimulation of the different muscle parts were recorded with the OKAS-3D jaw movement analysis system. The movement responses were expressed in polar coordinates. The variation in the direction of the jaw movement response was partly explained by the factors 'stimulation location' and 'jaw position' (ANOVA, p < 0.001). When the stimulation location shifted in an antero-posterior direction, the response changed from a vertical-lateral incisal point movement to a lateral-posterior movement with a smaller vertical component. The jaw position during stimulation also influenced the movement response. A functional subdivision of the temporalis muscle into at least three parts is favored.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med.Home page
J.H. Koolstra
DYNAMICS OF THE HUMAN MASTICATORY SYSTEM
Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med., July 1, 2002; 13(4): 366 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1996 Institutional Access Guidelines