JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Della Bona, A.
Right arrow Articles by van Noort, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Della Bona, A.
Right arrow Articles by van Noort, R.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 74, 1591-1596, Copyright © 1995 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic

A. Della Bona and R. van Noort
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Since the mode of failure of resin composites bonded to ceramics has frequently been reported to be cohesive fracture of either ceramic or resin composite rather than separation at the adhesive interface, this study was designed to question the validity of shear bond strength tests. The reasons for such a failure mode are identified and an alternative tensile bond strength test evaluated. Three configurations (A, conventional; B, reversed; and C, all composite) of the cylinder-on-disc design were produced for shear bond strength testing. Two-dimensional finite element stress analysis (FEA) was carried out to determine qualitatively the stress distribution for the three configurations. A tensile bond strength test was designed and used to evaluate two ceramic repair systems, one using hydrofluoric acid (HF) and the other acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF). Results from the shear bond strength tests and FEA showed that this particular test has as its inherent feature the measurement of the strength of the base material rather than the strength of the adhesive interface. In the tensile test, failure invariably occurred in the adhesive layer, with HF and APF showing a similar ability to improve the bond of resin composite to ceramic. It is concluded that the tensile bond strength test is more appropriate for evaluating the adhesive capabilities of resin composites to ceramics.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
C.J. Soares, P.V. Soares, P.C.F. Santos-Filho, and S.R. Armstrong
Microtensile Specimen Attachment and Shape Finite Element Analysis
J. Dent. Res., January 1, 2008; 87(1): 89 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
A. D. Bona, K.J. Anusavice, and J.J. Mecholsky Jr.
Apparent interfacial fracture toughness of resin/ceramic systems.
J. Dent. Res., November 1, 2006; 85(11): 1037 - 1041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
H. Bulut, A. D. Kaya, and M. Turkun
Tensile bond strength of brackets after antioxidant treatment on bleached teeth
Eur J Orthod, October 1, 2005; 27(5): 466 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
C. SHEN, E. MONDRAGON, V. V. GORDAN, and I. A. MJOR
The effect of mechanical undercuts on the strength of composite repair
J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2004; 135(10): 1406 - 1412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
A.A. El Zohairy, A.J. de Gee, N. de Jager, L.J. van Ruijven, and A.J. Feilzer
The Influence of Specimen Attachment and Dimension on Microtensile Strength
J. Dent. Res., May 1, 2004; 83(5): 420 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1995 Institutional Access Guidelines