JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahler, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mahler, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, M. A.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 73, 1663-1668, Copyright © 1994 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Hg emission from dental amalgam as related to the amount of Sn in the Ag-Hg (gamma 1) phase

D. B. Mahler, J. D. Adey and M. A. Fleming
Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland 97201.

Previous studies have shown that: (1) different dental amalgams emit different amounts of Hg vapor after surface films have been removed by abrasion (Boyer, 1988); (2) Sn oxide may be the predominant factor in these surface films that inhibit Hg vapor loss (Okabe et al., 1989); and (3) Sn in the Ag-Hg (gamma 1) phase may influence the vapor pressure of gamma 1 (Reynolds, 1974). The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between Hg vapor emission and the Sn content of the Ag-Hg (gamma 1) phase in dental amalgam. Eleven commercial amalgams were selected whose gamma 1 phases contain different amounts of Sn. Amalgam specimens were ground on 600-grit carborundum paper and immediately placed into an apparatus designed around a gold film Hg vapor detector. Hg vapor loss in air over a 30-minute period was determined, and the log10 Hg loss/volume fraction gamma 1 was plotted vs. the Sn content of the gamma 1 phase for the 11 test amalgams. A linear regression of these data, showing that of the higher the Sn content in gamma 1, the lower the Hg vapor loss, produced a highly significant R2 = 0.94 (p < 0.001). To examine for differences in vapor pressure among alloys, we eliminated the oxidation effect by conducting these same tests in an argon atmosphere. Although the Hg loss was significantly greater in argon than in air, the same differences among alloys were observed. Thus, from the standpoint of both vapor pressure and oxidation, the amount of Sn in the gamma 1 phase of dental amalgam has a significant and specific influence on the potential for Hg vapor emission.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1994 Institutional Access Guidelines