Journal of Dental Research, Vol 73, 1646-1656, Copyright © 1994 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals

ARTICLES

Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: evaluation of masticatory function

J. S. Feine, K. Maskawi, P. de Grandmont, W. B. Donohue, R. Tanguay and J. P. Lund
Faculte de medecine dentaire, Universite de Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

In the past, fixed prostheses were believed to be more efficient implant-supported devices than removable types for edentulous patients. However, this hypothesis was never properly tested. Therefore, a within-subject crossover clinical trial was designed in which 145 completely edentulous subjects were tested wearing implant-supported mandibular fixed prostheses and long-bar overdentures. Eight subjects received the fixed appliance first and seven the removable type. The patients' perceptions of various characteristics of the implant-supported prostheses were measured after a minimum of two months' adaptation. Mandibular movements and jaw muscle electromyographic activity were recorded while the patients chewed five standard-sized test foods: bread, apple, hard cheese, sausage, and raw carrot. The prostheses were then changed, worn for the same period of adaptation, and the procedures repeated. There were three test sessions per prosthesis, and each included five trials per food. The measurements were repeated three times at one-week intervals. Mastication time was found to be shorter for three foods (bread, cheese, and sausage) when subjects wore the long-bar overdenture. The vertical amplitude of the masticatory strokes was significantly less with the overdenture for all foods except carrot. Cycle duration was significantly longer with the overdenture for sausage and carrot. Contrary to what might be expected, the long-bar overdenture appears to be no less efficient than the fixed prosthesis. Furthermore, these data suggest that patients are capable of adapting their masticatory movements to the characteristics of the two prostheses.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A.F. Sutton, H.V. Worthington, and J.F. McCord RCT Comparing Posterior Occlusal Forms for Complete Dentures J. Dent. Res., July 1, 2007; 86(7): 651 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Hennequin, P.J. Allison, D. Faulks, T. Orliaguet, and J. Feine Chewing Indicators between Adults with Down Syndrome and Controls J. Dent. Res., November 1, 2005; 84(11): 1057 - 1061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F.M.C. van Kampen, A. van der Bilt, M.S. Cune, F.A. Fontijn-Tekamp, and F. Bosman Masticatory Function with Implant-supported Overdentures J. Dent. Res., September 1, 2004; 83(9): 708 - 711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.A. Morais, G. Heydecke, J. Pawliuk, J.P. Lund, and J.S. Feine The Effects of Mandibular Two-implant Overdentures on Nutrition in Elderly Edentulous Individuals J. Dent. Res., January 1, 2003; 82(1): 53 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]