JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vardimon, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Schmuth, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vardimon, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Schmuth, G. P.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 73, 67-74, Copyright © 1994 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

3-D force and moment analysis of repulsive magnetic appliances to correct dentofacial vertical excess

A. D. Vardimon, C. Bourauel, D. Drescher and G. P. Schmuth
Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Department of Orthodontics, Tel Aviv University, Israel.

Repulsive magnetic appliances can intrude posterior teeth, but create a lateral shift of the mandible and also decrease in force as the mouth opens. To model their optimal use, the 3-D spatial force/displacement (F/D) and moment/displacement (M/D) diagrams of four magnetic repulsive appliances in diverse overlapping arrangements were characterized and compared. In this orthodontic measurement and simulation system, only the medial eccentric magnetic arrangement, of the four compared, partially met the criteria of an optimal repulsive force system, i.e., keeping a constant intruding force and excluding shearing force. The moment analysis found that eccentric arrangements, however, developed high Z-moment. Thus, a perplexing point was reached where the force analysis favored medial centric arrangement and the moment analysis favored centric arrangement. When the gap between juxtaposed magnets increased over 2 mm, the repulsive force declined and the attractive force was favorably eliminated. At gap distances of 3 to 6 mm, the intrusive force was almost constant. These data suggest that centric arrangement is indicated clinically when the gap is minute and Muller prongs are used to prevent deleterious lateral shearing forces.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1994 Institutional Access Guidelines