JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dawes, C.
Right arrow Articles by MacPherson, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dawes, C.
Right arrow Articles by MacPherson, L. M.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 72, 852-857, Copyright © 1993 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

The distribution of saliva and sucrose around the mouth during the use of chewing gum and the implications for the site-specificity of caries and calculus deposition

C. Dawes and L. M. MacPherson
Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

Over a 20-minute period, subjects expectorated 8 samples of whole saliva (EWS) while chewing gum. Flow rates were calculated, and sucrose was analyzed in these samples as well as in saliva collected on filter paper strips from different tooth surfaces. Salivary film velocity (SFV), based on a 0.1-mm-thick film, was estimated from the clearance half-times of KCl in agarose disks positioned in different regions of the mouth. Salivary flow rate peaked at 5.1 mL/min in the first min but fell to about 1.25 mL/min by the end of the 20 min of gum-chewing. In contrast, flow rate when subjects sucked sour lemon drops averaged about 5.3 mL/min throughout the 20-minute period. The mean salivary sucrose concentration during gum-chewing peaked in the second min at 384 mmol/L (13.1%) but had fallen to 14 mmol/L by the 15-20-minute time interval. The sucrose concentrations on the palatal surfaces of the upper incisors and the facial and lingual surfaces of the lower molars were not significantly different from that in EWS but were much lower on the facial surfaces of the upper incisors and molars, and on the lingual surfaces of the lower incisors. When flow was unstimulated, SFV was 0.8-1.0 mm/min on the facial surfaces of the upper incisors and lower molars but about 5-8 mm/min on the facial surfaces of the upper molars and on the lingual surfaces of the lower incisors and molars.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
C. Dawes
Salivary flow patterns and the health of hard and soft oral tissues
J Am Dent Assoc, May 1, 2008; 139(suppl_2): 18S - 24S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med.Home page
R.M. Love and H.F. Jenkinson
INVASION OF DENTINAL TUBULES BY ORAL BACTERIA
Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med., March 1, 2002; 13(2): 171 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1993 Institutional Access Guidelines