JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spears, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Howard, I. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spears, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Howard, I. C.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 72, 1526-1531, Copyright © 1993 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals

ARTICLES

The effects of enamel anisotropy on the distribution of stress in a tooth

I. R. Spears, R. van Noort, R. H. Crompton, G. E. Cardew and I. C. Howard
Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Enamel is thought to have highly anisotropic stiffness characteristics, because of its prismatic structure. It is probable that the enamel is stiffer in the prism direction compared with a direction perpendicular to it. The prisms are thought to run approximately perpendicular to the enamel-dentin junction. The curvilinear anisotropy that will result can readily be modeled by TOMECH, a finite element program developed at the University of Sheffield, since curvilinearity of mechanical properties is available as an automated feature of this program. The patterns of stress due to an external load were investigated in two-dimensional abstract models, and in a model of a mandibular second premolar, for both anisotropic and isotropic enamel. Results were compared with the commercial code ANSYS and good agreement obtained. Enamel with anisotropic properties was found to have a profoundly different stress distribution under load when compared with models with isotropic enamel. For isotropic enamel, the load path is directed through the stiff enamel shell, while for anisotropic enamel, the load path is directed into the dentin, as the load path follows the stiff direction of the enamel prisms. Thus, if enamel is indeed anisotropic, its function differs greatly from that suggested in previous hypotheses. Enamel with anisotropic material characteristics would provide a hard-wearing protective surface-coating while simultaneously diverting the load away from this brittle, low-tensile-strength phase, thus reducing the potential for tooth fracture.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
L. A. LITONJUA, S. ANDREANA, P. J. BUSH, T. S. TOBIAS, and R. E. COHEN
Noncarious cervical lesions and abfractions: A re-evaluation
J Am Dent Assoc, July 1, 2003; 134(7): 845 - 850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1993 Institutional Access Guidelines