JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mojon, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ma, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mojon, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ma, P. H.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 71, 1633-1639, Copyright © 1992 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Early bond strength of luting cements to a precious alloy

P. Mojon, E. B. Hawbolt, M. I. MacEntee and P. H. Ma
Department of Clinical Dental Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Previous studies have reported that glass-ionomer and adhesive resin cements can bond to various alloys, while zinc phosphate cements lack this adhesive property. This study evaluated the bonding properties of three luting cements during the first seven days after cementation. Thirty cylinders were cast with a high-noble porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) alloy and luted in pairs with one of the cements. The joints were stored in water at 37 degrees C for one, two, or seven days before being fractured in shear. The cylinders were re-used to provide 40 joints within each test group. The data were subjected to a Weibull analysis, a curve-fitting method shown to be appropriate for comparing the bond strengths of dental materials. The results showed that the zinc phosphate cement was the weakest material, whereas the adhesive resin produced the strongest joints. Microscopic observations of the fractured samples did not reveal any specific differences between the samples in terms of their mechanism of fracture. The glass-ionomer cement reached its maximum bond strength after two days, whereas storage time had no influence on the zinc phosphate cement. The adhesive resin cement was slightly, but not significantly, weaker after one week in water. We suggest that excessive loading of restorations cemented with glass ionomer should be avoided for the first two days after the placement. The use of an adhesive resin cement can be recommended on endodontically treated teeth, but further studies are needed to evaluate its biocompatibility and adhesion to dentin.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1992 Institutional Access Guidelines