JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Spronsen, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by van Ginkel, F. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Spronsen, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by van Ginkel, F. C.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 71, 1279-1285, Copyright © 1992 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

A comparison of jaw muscle cross-sections of long-face and normal adults

P. H. van Spronsen, W. A. Weijs, J. Valk, B. Prahl-Andersen and F. C. van Ginkel
Department of Orthodontics, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), The Netherlands.

Long-face subjects have smaller maximum molar bite forces than do normal individuals. This has been attributed both to differences in moment arms and size of the jaw muscles. In this study, a comparison was made between the mid-belly cross-sectional areas of the jaw muscles of 13 long-face and 35 normal adults by means of serial MRI scans. The subjects were selected on the basis of anterior lower face height as a percentage of anterior total face height. These and other cephalometric variables were measured from lateral radiographs. In the long-face group, the cross-sectional areas of the masseter, medial pterygoid, and anterior temporal muscles were, respectively, 30%, 22%, and 15% smaller than in the control group. By a discriminant analysis and a multivariate analysis of variance, these differences were found to be significant (p less than 0.001). The findings of this study hint that differences in the sizes of the jaw muscles of long-face and normal subjects might explain, in part, the observed differences in maximum molar bite force.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
T.K. Goto, S. Nishida, M. Yahagi, G.E.J. Langenbach, Y. Nakamura, K. Tokumori, S. Sakai, H. Yabuuchi, and K. Yoshiura
Size and orientation of masticatory muscles in patients with mandibular laterognathism.
J. Dent. Res., June 1, 2006; 85(6): 552 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
T. Matsuyuki, T. Kitahara, and A. Nakashima
Developmental changes in craniofacial morphology in subjects with Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Eur J Orthod, February 1, 2006; 28(1): 42 - 50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
J.A.M Korfage, J.H. Koolstra, G.E.J. Langenbach, and T.M.G.J. van Eijden
Fiber-type Composition of the Human Jaw Muscles--(Part 2) Role of Hybrid Fibers and Factors Responsible for Inter-individual Variation
J. Dent. Res., September 1, 2005; 84(9): 784 - 793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1992 Institutional Access Guidelines