JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, M.
Right arrow Articles by Marthaler, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, M.
Right arrow Articles by Marthaler, T. M.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 71, 1926-1933, Copyright © 1992 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Dental predictors of high caries increment in children

M. Steiner, U. Helfenstein and T. M. Marthaler
Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University of Zurich, Switzerland.

A comprehensive set of dental variables was investigated to find the "best" combination of predictors for high caries increment in 7/8-year-old and 10/11-year-old children. Four populations with widely different caries prevalence were studied. Logistic regression analysis supplied multiple-input models by stepwise selection of predictors. A "low number of sound primary molars" was the best and most consistent predictor of high caries increment. The second best predictors were "high numbers of pre-cavity lesions on permanent first molars" (discolored pits and fissures in the younger age group and white spots on the smooth parts of buccolingual surfaces in the older age group). Inclusion of radiological variables did not substantially increase the quality of prediction. For practical application, models with various multiple inputs selected by stepwise procedures were compared with "fixed" three-input models. These three-input models resulted in predictive quality nearly equal to those of the multiple models. Traditional one-input models, containing DMFT or dmft, were inferior to the three-input models, particularly in the older age class. The lower the caries prevalence of the source data, the better was the prediction. As a summary measure characterizing the predictive performance of a model, we used the index "area under the receiver operating characteristic curve" A. For the 1984 data and the three-input models, the area was approximately 80%, and for the 1972 data, the area was 65-70%.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
A. F. Zandona and D. T. Zero
Diagnostic tools for early caries detection
J Am Dent Assoc, December 1, 2006; 137(12): 1675 - 1684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
S. Petti, Y. Li, and W. Wang
Comment on Li and Wang's eight-year longitudinal study of caries on primary teeth.
J. Dent. Res., December 1, 2002; 81(12): 804 - 804.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
Y. Li and W. Wang
Predicting Caries in Permanent Teeth from Caries in Primary Teeth: An Eight-year Cohort Study
J. Dent. Res., August 1, 2002; 81(8): 561 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1992 Institutional Access Guidelines